Reconstruction, simulation and analysis of enzyme-constrained metabolic models using GECKO Toolbox 3.0

Yu Chen, Johan Gustafsson, Albert Tafur Rangel, Mihail Anton, Iván Domenzain, Cheewin Kittikunapong, Feiran Li, Le Yuan, Jens Nielsen, Eduard J. Kerkhoven

Published: 2024-01-18 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-023-00931-7

ecModels

enzyme-constrained metabolic models

GECKO Toolbox 3.0

kinetic data integration

omics data integration

AI 解读

Extraction of nuclei from archived postmortem tissues for single-nucleus sequencing applications

High-quality and robust protein quantification in large clinical/pharmaceutical cohorts with IonStar proteomics investigation

Longitudinal interrogation of sympathetic neural circuits and hemodynamics in preclinical models

Experimental modulation of physiological force application on leg joint neurons in intactDrosophila melanogaster

Combining surface-accessible Ag and Au colloidal nanomaterials with SERS for in situ analysis of molecule–metal interactions in complex solution environments

Generation of mouse–human chimeric embryos

Labeling and tracking of immune cells in ex vivo human skin

Large-scale preparation of fluorescence multiplex host cell reactivation (FM-HCR) reporters

Mutate-and-chemical-shift-fingerprint (MCSF) to characterize excited states in RNA using NMR spectroscopy

Comprehensive multi-attribute method workflow for biotherapeutic characterization and current good manufacturing practices testing

查看全部

Sections

Figures

References

Chang, A. et al. BRENDA, the ELIXIR core data resource in 2021: new developments and updates. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D498–D508 (2021).
Davidi, D. & Milo, R. Lessons on enzyme kinetics from quantitative proteomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 46, 81–89 (2017).
Kim, W. J., Kim, H. U. & Lee, S. Y. Current state and applications of microbial genome-scale metabolic models. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 2, 10–18 (2017).
Chen, Y., Li, G. & Nielsen, J. Genome-scale metabolic modeling from yeast to human cell models of complex diseases: latest advances and challenges. Methods Mol. Biol. 2049, 329–345 (2019).
Clark, T. J., Guo, L., Morgan, J. & Schwender, J. Modeling plant metabolism: from network reconstruction to mechanistic models. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 303–326 (2020).
Fang, X., Lloyd, C. J. & Palsson, B. O. Reconstructing organisms in silico: genome-scale models and their emerging applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00440-4 (2020).
Heinken, A., Basile, A., Hertel, J., Thinnes, C. & Thiele, I. Genome-scale metabolic modeling of the human microbiome in the era of personalized medicine. Annu Rev. Microbiol 75, 199–222 (2021).
Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H. & Palsson, B. O. Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 291–305 (2012).
Lloyd, C. J. et al. COBRAme: a computational framework for genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006302 (2018).
Goelzer, A. et al. Quantitative prediction of genome-wide resource allocation in bacteria. Metab. Eng. 32, 232–243 (2015).
Salvy, P. & Hatzimanikatis, V. The ETFL formulation allows multi-omics integration in thermodynamics-compliant metabolism and expression models. Nat. Commun. 11, 30 (2020).
Chen, Y. et al. Proteome constraints reveal targets for improving microbial fitness in nutrient‐rich environments. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10093 (2021).
Beg, Q. K. et al. Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12663–12668 (2007).
Adadi, R., Volkmer, B., Milo, R., Heinemann, M. & Shlomi, T. Prediction of microbial growth rate versus biomass yield by a metabolic network with kinetic parameters. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002575 (2012).
Sánchez, B. J. et al. Improving the phenotype predictions of a yeast genome-scale metabolic model by incorporating enzymatic constraints. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 935 (2017).
Bekiaris, P. S. & Klamt, S. Automatic construction of metabolic models with enzyme constraints. BMC Bioinforma. 21, 19 (2020).
Mao, Z. et al. ECMpy, a simplified workflow for constructing enzymatic constrained metabolic network model. Biomolecules 12, 65 (2022).
Domenzain, I. et al. Reconstruction of a catalogue of genome-scale metabolic models with enzymatic constraints using GECKO 2.0. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–13 (2022).
Chen, Y. & Nielsen, J. Mathematical modelling of proteome constraints within metabolism. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 25, 50–56 (2021).
Kerkhoven, E. J. Advances in constraint-based models: methods for improved predictive power based on resource allocation constraints. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 68, 102168 (2022).
Chen, Y. & Nielsen, J. Energy metabolism controls phenotypes by protein efficiency and allocation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17592–17597 (2019).
Gustafsson, J. et al. Metabolic collaboration between cells in the tumor microenvironment has a negligible effect on tumor growth. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.08.479584 (2022).
Chen, Y. & Nielsen, J. Yeast has evolved to minimize protein resource cost for synthesizing amino acids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2114622119 (2022).
Li, F. et al. Deep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction. Nat. Catal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00798-z (2022).
Sulheim, S. et al. Enzyme-constrained models and omics analysis of Streptomyces coelicolor reveal metabolic changes that enhance heterologous production. iScience 23, 101525 (2020).
Zhou, J., Zhuang, Y. & Xia, J. Integration of enzyme constraints in a genome-scale metabolic model of Aspergillus niger improves phenotype predictions. Microb. Cell Fact. 20, 125 (2021).
Ye, C. et al. Improving lysine production through construction of an Escherichia coli enzyme‐constrained model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 117, 3533–3544 (2020).
Chen, Y. et al. Genome‐scale modeling for Bacillus coagulans to understand the metabolic characteristics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 117, 3545–3558 (2020).
Lu, H. et al. Yeast metabolic innovations emerged via expanded metabolic network and gene positive selection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10427 (2021).
Ishchuk, O. P. et al. Genome-scale modeling drives 70-fold improvement of intracellular heme production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2108245119 (2022).
Li, Z. et al. Systems engineering of Escherichia coli for high-level shikimate production. Metab. Eng. 75, 1–11 (2023).
Bujdoš, D. et al. Engineering of Pseudomonas putida for accelerated co-utilization of glucose and cellobiose yields aerobic overproduction of pyruvate explained by an upgraded metabolic model. Metab. Eng. 75, 29–46 (2023).
Domenzain, I., Lu, Y., Shi, J., Lu, H. & Nielsen, J. Computational biology predicts metabolic engineering targets for increased production of 102 valuable chemicals in yeast. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.31.526512 (2023).
Heirendt, L. et al. Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0. Nat. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0098-2 (2019).
Orth, J. D., Thiele, I. & Palsson, B. O. What is flux balance analysis? Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 245 (2010).
Gudmundsson, S. & Thiele, I. Computationally efficient flux variability analysis. BMC Bioinforma. 11, 489 (2010).
Choi, H. S., Lee, S. Y., Kim, T. Y. & Woo, H. M. In silico identification of gene amplification targets for improvement of lycopene production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 3097–3105 (2010).
Agren, R. et al. Identification of anticancer drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma through personalized genome-scale metabolic modeling. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 721 (2014).
Cho, J. S., Gu, C., Han, T. H., Ryu, J. Y. & Lee, S. Y. Reconstruction of context-specific genome-scale metabolic models using multiomics data to study metabolic rewiring. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 15, 1–11 (2019).
Robinson, J. L. et al. An atlas of human metabolism. Sci. Signal. 13, 1482 (2020).
Yeo, H. C., Hong, J., Lakshmanan, M. & Lee, D. Y. Enzyme capacity-based genome scale modelling of CHO cells. Metab. Eng. 60, 138–147 (2020).
Wendering, P. & Nikoloski, Z. Genome-scale modeling specifies the metabolic capabilities of Rhizophagus irregularis. mSystems 7, e0121621 (2022).
Wu, K. et al. ecBSU1: A genome-scale enzyme-constrained model of Bacillus subtilis based on the ECMpy workflow. Microorganisms 11, 178 (2023).
Österberg, L. et al. A novel yeast hybrid modeling framework integrating Boolean and enzyme-constrained networks enables exploration of the interplay between signaling and metabolism. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008891 (2021).
Chen, Y., Li, F. & Nielsen, J. Genome-scale modeling of yeast metabolism: retrospectives and perspectives. FEMS Yeast Res 22, 1–9 (2022).
The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D523–D531 (2023).
Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 49, D545–D551 (2021).
Thiele, I. & Palsson, B. Ø. A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Nat. Protoc. 5, 93–121 (2010).
Norsigian, C. J., Fang, X., Seif, Y., Monk, J. M. & Palsson, B. O. A workflow for generating multi-strain genome-scale metabolic models of prokaryotes. Nat. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0254-3 (2019).
Machado, D., Andrejev, S., Tramontano, M. & Patil, K. R. Fast automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models for microbial species and communities. Nucleic Acids Res 46, 7542–7553 (2018).
Wang, H. et al. RAVEN 2.0: a versatile toolbox for metabolic network reconstruction and a case study on Streptomyces coelicolor. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006541 (2018).
Davidi, D. et al. Global characterization of in vivo enzyme catalytic rates and their correspondence to in vitro kcat measurements. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3401–3406 (2016).
Küken, A., Gennermann, K. & Nikoloski, Z. Characterization of maximal enzyme catalytic rates in central metabolism of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 103, 2168–2177 (2020).
Heckmann, D. et al. Kinetic profiling of metabolic specialists demonstrates stability and consistency of in vivo enzyme turnover numbers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 23182–23190 (2020).
Chen, Y. & Nielsen, J. In vitro turnover numbers do not reflect in vivo activities of yeast enzymes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, 2021 (2021).
Xu, R., Razaghi-Moghadam, Z. & Nikoloski, Z. Maximization of non-idle enzymes improves the coverage of the estimated maximal in vivo enzyme catalytic rates in Escherichia coli. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTAB575 (2021).
Heckmann, D. et al. Machine learning applied to enzyme turnover numbers reveals protein structural correlates and improves metabolic models. Nat. Commun. 9, 5252 (2018).
Schendel, F., Mueller, E., Stubbe, J., Shiau, A. & Smith, J. Formylglycinamide ribonucleotide synthetase from Escherichia coli: cloning, sequencing, overproduction, isolation, and characterization. Biochemistry 28, 2459–2471 (1989).
Sánchez, B. J. et al. Benchmarking accuracy and precision of intensity-based absolute quantification of protein abundances in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics 21, e2000093 (2021).
Van Hoek, P., Van Dijken, J. P. & Pronk, J. T. Effect of specific growth rate on fermentative capacity of baker’s yeast. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 4226–4233 (1998).
Heublein, M. et al. The novel component Kgd4 recruits the E3 subunit to the mitochondrial α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 3342–3349 (2014).
Sánchez, B. J., Li, F., Kerkhoven, E. J. & Nielsen, J. SLIMEr: probing flexibility of lipid metabolism in yeast with an improved constraint-based modeling framework. BMC Syst. Biol. 13, 4 (2019).
Lewis, N. E. et al. Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 390 (2010).

Reconstruction, simulation and analysis of enzyme-constrained metabolic models using GECKO Toolbox 3.0

推荐阅读