StarMap: a user-friendly workflow for Rosetta-driven molecular structure refinement

Wolfgang Lugmayr, Vadim Kotov, Nikolaus Goessweiner-Mohr, Jiri Wald, Frank DiMaio, Thomas C. Marlovits

Published: 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-022-00757-9

Cryo-EM

StarMap

Rosetta refinement

Monte Carlo sampling

Structural validation

AI 解读

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video 1

This short video shows how to set up a StarMap refinement and how to inspect outputs

Supplementary Software 1

A distribution of StarMap (any platform)

Supplementary Data 1

Input and output files for an exemplary StarMap run (Box 3)

Tutorial: guidelines for the computational analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data

ProBac-seq, a bacterial single-cell RNA sequencing methodology using droplet microfluidics and large oligonucleotide probe sets

Identification of cancer-related mutations in human pluripotent stem cells using RNA-seq analysis

Spiral volumetric optoacoustic tomography for imaging whole-body biodynamics in small animals

Genetic manipulation and immortalized culture of ex vivo primary human germinal center B cells

Tutorial: design and execution of CRISPR in vivo screens

Reproducible strategy for excisional skin-wound-healing studies in mice

CRISPR–Cas9-mediated chromosome engineering inArabidopsis thaliana

Human primordial germ cell-like cells specified from resetting precursors develop in human hindgut organoids

Tracking endocytosis and intracellular distribution of spherical nucleic acids with correlative single-cell imaging

查看全部

Sections

Figures

References

Supplementary information

Kühlbrandt, W. Biochemistry. The resolution revolution. Science 343, 1443–1444 (2014).
Milne, J. L. S. et al. Cryo-electron microscopy: a primer for the non-microscopist. FEBS J. 280, 28–45 (2013).
Henderson, R. & McMullan, G. Problems in obtaining perfect images by single-particle electron cryomicroscopy of biological structures in amorphous ice. Microscopy 62, 43–50 (2013).
Baker, T. S. & Henderson, R. Electron cryomicroscopy of biological macromolecules. In International Tables for Crystallography Vol. F (eds. Arnold, E., Himmel, D. M. & Rossmann, M. G.) 593–614 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012).
Scheres, S. H. W. Processing of structurally heterogeneous cryo-EM data in RELION. In Methods in Enzymology Vol. 579 (ed. Crowther, R. A.) 125–157 (Academic Press, 2016).
Ludtke, S. J. Single-particle refinement and variability analysis in EMAN2.1. In Methods in Enzymology Vol. 579 (ed. Crowther, R. A.) 159–189 (Academic Press, 2016).
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
Cowtan, K. The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 1002–1011 (2006).
Chen, M., Baldwin, P. R., Ludtke, S. J. & Baker, M. L. De novo modeling in cryo-EM density maps with Pathwalking. J. Struct. Biol. 196, 289–298 (2016).
Chojnowski, G., Sobolev, E., Heuser, P. & Lamzin, V. S. The accuracy of protein models automatically built into cryo-EM maps with ARP/wARP. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 77, 142–150 (2021).
Terwilliger, T. C., Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V. & Sobolev, O. V. A fully automatic method yielding initial models from high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy maps. Nat. Methods 15, 905–908 (2018).
Frenz, B., Walls, A. C., Egelman, E. H., Veesler, D. & DiMaio, F. RosettaES: a sampling strategy enabling automated interpretation of difficult cryo-EM maps. Nat. Methods 14, 797–800 (2017).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 74, 531–544 (2018).
Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 74, 519–530 (2018).
Kim, D. N. et al. Cryo_fit: democratization of flexible fitting for cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 208, 1–6 (2019).
Kidmose, R. T. et al. Namdinator – automatic molecular dynamics flexible fitting of structural models into cryo-EM and crystallography experimental maps. IUCrJ 6, 526–531 (2019).
Simons, K. T., Kooperberg, C., Huang, E. & Baker, D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 209–225 (1997).
Simons, K. T. et al. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 34, 82–95 (1999).
Leman, J. K. et al. Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks. Nat. Methods 17, 665–680 (2020).
Alford, R. F. et al. The Rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3031–3048 (2017).
DiMaio, F. et al. Atomic-accuracy models from 4.5-Å cryo-electron microscopy data with density-guided iterative local refinement. Nat. Methods 12, 361–365 (2015).
DiMaio, F., Tyka, M. D., Baker, M. L., Chiu, W. & Baker, D. Refinement of protein structures into low-resolution density maps using rosetta. J. Mol. Biol. 392, 181–190 (2009).
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
Frenz, B. et al. Automatically fixing errors in glycoprotein structures with Rosetta. Structure 27, 134–139.e3 (2019).
Pavlovicz, R. E., Park, H. & DiMaio, F. Efficient consideration of coordinated water molecules improves computational protein-protein and protein-ligand docking discrimination. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008103 (2020).
Renfrew, P. D., Choi, E. J., Bonneau, R. & Kuhlman, B. Incorporation of noncanonical amino acids into Rosetta and use in computational protein-peptide interface design. PLoS One 7, e32637 (2012).
Wang, R. Y.-R. et al. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta. eLife 5, e17219 (2016).
Xu, J. et al. Structural basis for the initiation of eukaryotic transcription-coupled DNA repair. Nature 551, 653–657 (2017).
Usluer, G. D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the bacterial actin AlfA reveals unique assembly and ATP-binding interactions and the absence of a conserved subdomain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3356–3361 (2018).
James, Z. M. et al. CryoEM structure of a prokaryotic cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4430–4435 (2017).
Kotov, V., Lunelli, M., Wald, J., Kolbe, M. & Marlovits, T. C. Helical reconstruction of Salmonella and Shigella needle filaments attached to type 3 basal bodies. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 27, 101039 (2021).
Wald, J. et al. Cryo-EM structure of pleconaril-resistant rhinovirus-B5 complexed to the antiviral OBR-5-340 reveals unexpected binding site. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19109–19115 (2019).
Bunduc, C. M. et al. Structure and dynamics of a mycobacterial type VII secretion system. Nature 593, 445–448 (2021).
Miletic, S. et al. Substrate-engaged type III secretion system structures reveal gating mechanism for unfolded protein translocation. Nat. Commun. 12, 1546 (2021).
Goessweiner-Mohr, N. et al. Structural control for the coordinated assembly into functional pathogenic type-3 secretion systems. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/714097v1.full (2019).
Wald, J. et al. Mechanism of AAA+ ATPase-mediated RuvAB–Holliday junction branch migration. Nature 609, 630–639 (2022).
Loquet, A. et al. Atomic model of the type III secretion system needle. Nature 486, 276–279 (2012).
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Terwilliger, T. C., Sobolev, O. V., Afonine, P. V., Adams, P. D. & Read, R. J. Density modification of cryo-EM maps. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 76, 912–925 (2020).
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 1–8 (2021).
Lawson, C. L. et al. EMDataBank.org: unified data resource for CryoEM. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D456–D464 (2011).
De Rosier, D. J. & Klug, A. Reconstruction of three dimensional structures from electron micrographs. Nature 217, 130–134 (1968).
Zhang, X., Jin, L., Fang, Q., Hui, W. H. & Zhou, Z. H. 3.3 Å cryo-EM structure of a nonenveloped virus reveals a priming mechanism for cell entry. Cell 141, 472–482 (2010).
Dube, P., Tavares, P., Lurz, R. & van Heel, M. The portal protein of bacteriophage SPP1: a DNA pump with 13-fold symmetry. EMBO J. 12, 1303–1309 (1993).
Costa, A. & Patwardhan, A. A novel mirror-symmetry analysis approach for the study of macromolecular assemblies imaged by electron microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 378, 273–283 (2008).
Marco, S. et al. The molecular chaperone TF55. FEBS Lett. 341, 152–155 (1994).
He, S. & Scheres, S. H. W. Helical reconstruction in RELION. J. Struct. Biol. 198, 163–176 (2017).
Zhang, X. Python-based Helix Indexer: a GUI program for finding symmetry of helical assembly through Fourier-Bessel indexing of electron microscopic data. Protein Sci. 31, 107–117 (2022).
Tykač, M., Černý, J. & Murshudov, G. N. De novo detection of symmetry in cryo-EM density maps. Acta Crystallogr. A 77, C692 (2021).
Reboul, C. F., Kiesewetter, S., Elmlund, D. & Elmlund, H. Point-group symmetry detection in three-dimensional charge density of biomolecules. Bioinformatics 36, 2237–2243 (2020).
DiMaio, F. et al. Improved low-resolution crystallographic refinement with Phenix and Rosetta. Nat. Methods 10, 1102–1104 (2013).
Terwilliger, T. C. et al. phenix.mr_rosetta: molecular replacement and model rebuilding with Phenix and Rosetta. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 13, 81–90 (2012).
Pražnikar, J., Afonine, P. V., Gunčar, G., Adams, P. D. & Turk, D. Averaged kick maps: less noise, more signal…and probably less bias. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 65, 921–931 (2009).
Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 352–367 (2012).
Skubák, P., Murshudov, G. N. & Pannu, N. S. Direct incorporation of experimental phase information in model refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2196–2201 (2004).
Bourne, P. E. et al. Macromolecular crystallographic information file. In Methods in Enzymology Vol. 277 (eds. Abelson, J. N., Simon, M. I., Carter, Jr., C. W. & Sweet, R. M.) 571–590 (Academic Press, 1997).
Westbrook, J. D. & Fitzgerald, P. M. D. The PDB format, mmCIF formats, and other data formats. In Structural Bioinformatics (eds. Bourne, P. E. & Weissig, H.) 159–179 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2003).
Park, H., Zhou, G., Baek, M., Baker, D. & DiMaio, F. Force field optimization guided by small molecule crystal lattice data enables consistent sub-angstrom protein–ligand docking. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 2000–2010 (2021).
Wlodawer, A., Li, M. & Dauter, Z. High-resolution cryo-EM maps and models: a crystallographer’s perspective. Structure 25, 1589–1597.e1 (2017).
Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876 (2021).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Wang, S., Sun, S., Li, Z., Zhang, R. & Xu, J. Accurate de novo prediction of protein contact map by ultra-deep learning model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005324 (2017).
Yang, J. et al. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 12, 7–8 (2015).
Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303 (2018).
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022).
Keating, K. S. & Pyle, A. M. RCrane: semi-automated RNA model building. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 985–995 (2012).
Kappel, K. et al. De novo computational RNA modeling into cryo-EM maps of large ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Methods 15, 947–954 (2018).
Jossinet, F., Ludwig, T. E. & Westhof, E. Assemble: an interactive graphical tool to analyze and build RNA architectures at the 2D and 3D levels. Bioinformatics 26, 2057–2059 (2010).
Chou, F.-C., Echols, N., Terwilliger, T. C. & Das, R. RNA structure refinement using the ERRASER-Phenix pipeline. Methods Mol. Biol. 1320, 269–282 (2016).
Fleishman, S. J. et al. RosettaScripts: a scripting language interface to the Rosetta macromolecular modeling suite. PLoS ONE 6, e20161 (2011).
van Zundert, G. C. P., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., van Zundert, G. C. P. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Fast and sensitive rigid-body fitting into cryo-EM density maps with PowerFit. AIMS Biophys. 2, 73–87 (2015).
Feng, Z. et al. Ligand Depot: a data warehouse for ligands bound to macromolecules. Bioinformatics 20, 2153–2155 (2004).
Dimitropoulos, D., Ionides, J. & Henrick, K. Using MSDchem to search the PDB ligand dictionary. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 14, 14.3.1–14.3.21 (2006).
Long, F. et al. AceDRG: a stereochemical description generator for ligands. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 73, 112–122 (2017).
Landrum, G. et al. RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics. Available at https://zenodo.org/record/6961488#.YyplJOzML_U (Zenodo, 2021).
Yoshikawa, N. & Hutchison, G. R. Fast, efficient fragment-based coordinate generation for Open Babel. J. Cheminform. 11, 49 (2019).
Terwilliger, T. C., Klei, H., Adams, P. D., Moriarty, N. W. & Cohn, J. D. Automated ligand fitting by core-fragment fitting and extension into density. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 915–922 (2006).
Evrard, G. X., Langer, G. G., Perrakis, A. & Lamzin, V. S. Assessment of automatic ligand building in ARP/wARP. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. l Crystallogr. 63, 108–117 (2007).
Nicholls, R. A. Ligand fitting with CCP4. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 73, 158–170 (2017).
Kahraman, A. et al. Cross-link guided molecular modeling with ROSETTA. PLoS ONE 8, e73411 (2013).
Ovchinnikov, S., Kamisetty, H. & Baker, D. Robust and accurate prediction of residue–residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. eLife 3, e02030 (2014).
Marks, D. S. et al. Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS ONE 6, e28766 (2011).
Veusz - A Scientific Plotting Package. Available at https://veusz.github.io/
Liu, K. et al. Structural basis of CXC chemokine receptor 2 activation and signalling. Nature 585, 135–140 (2020).
The UniProt Consortium. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D191–D198 (2014).
Olieric, V. et al. Data-collection strategy for challenging native SAD phasing. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 72, 421–429 (2016).
Santos, R. et al. Structure of human immunoproteasome with a reversible and noncompetitive inhibitor that selectively inhibits activated lymphocytes. Nat. Commun. 8, 1692 (2017).
Grieben, M. et al. Structure of the polycystic kidney disease TRP channel Polycystin-2 (PC2). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 114–122 (2017).
Zhou, X. et al. Cryo-EM structures of the human endolysosomal TRPML3 channel in three distinct states. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 1146–1154 (2017).
Ruiz Carrillo, D. et al. Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of human aquaporin 1 at a resolution of 3.28 Å. Acta Crystallogr. F. Struct. Biol. Commun. 70, 1657–1663 (2014).
Yuan, B. et al. Structural dynamics of the functional nonameric type III translocase export gate. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 167188 (2021).
Roh, S.-H. et al. Subunit conformational variation within individual GroEL oligomers resolved by Cryo-EM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8259–8264 (2017).

StarMap: a user-friendly workflow for Rosetta-driven molecular structure refinement

Supplementary information

推荐阅读