Analysis of combinatorial CRISPR screens with the Orthrus scoring pipeline

Chad L. Myers, Henry N. Ward, Michael Aregger, Thomas Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, Maximilian Billmann, Toshiro K. Ohsumi, Kevin R. Brown, Benjamin J. Blencowe, Jason Moffat

Published: 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00596-0

Combinatorial CRISPR screens

Orthrus scoring pipeline

Multiplexed screening

gRNA expression

Screen quality assessment

AI 解读

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Tutorial on how to set up input files to run the Orthrus scoring pipeline

Fabrication of angstrom-scale two-dimensional channels for mass transport

Efficient and strand-specific profiling of replicating chromatin with enrichment and sequencing of protein-associated nascent DNA in mammalian cells

The eINTACT method for studying nuclear changes in host plant cells targeted by bacterial effectors in native infection contexts

Rapid reaction optimization by robust and economical quantitative benchtop19F NMR spectroscopy

Profiling native pulmonary basement membrane stiffness using atomic force microscopy

Photoimmunotechnology as a powerful biological tool for molecular-based elimination of target cells and microbes, including bacteria, fungi and viruses

Measuring key human carbohydrate digestive enzyme activities using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection

Neural cell isolation from adult macaques for high-throughput analyses and neurosphere cultures

Preparation, validation and use of a vasoactive tryptophan-derived hydroperoxide and relevant control compounds

Neuronal subtype-specific growth cone and soma purification from mammalian CNS via fractionation and fluorescent sorting for subcellular analyses and spatial mapping of local transcriptomes and proteomes

查看全部

Sections

Figures

References

Supplementary information

VanderSluis, B. et al. Integrating genetic and protein–protein interaction networks maps a functional wiring diagram of a cell. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 45, 170–179 (2018).
Costanzo, M. et al. A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353, aaf1420–aaf1420 (2016).
Simpkins, S. W. et al. Predicting bioprocess targets of chemical compounds through integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006532–e1006532 (2018).
Piotrowski, J. S. et al. Functional annotation of chemical libraries across diverse biological processes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 982–993 (2017).
Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M. & Lander, E. S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343, 80–84 (2014).
Hart, T. et al. High-resolution CRISPR screens reveal fitness genes and genotype-specific cancer liabilities. Cell 163, 1515–1526 (2015).
Ruiz, S. et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies CDC25A as a determinant of sensitivity to ATR inhibitors. Mol. Cell 62, 307–313 (2016).
Wong, A. S. L. et al. Multiplexed barcoded CRISPR-Cas9 screening enabled by CombiGEM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 2544–2549 (2016).
Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576.e16 (2017).
Aregger, M. et al. Systematic mapping of genetic interactions for de novo fatty acid synthesis identifies C12orf49 as a regulator of lipid metabolism. Nat. Metab 2, 499–513 (2020).
Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T. et al. Genetic interaction mapping and exon-resolution functional genomics with a hybrid Cas9–Cas12a platform. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 638–648 (2020).
Najm, F. J. et al. Orthologous CRISPR-Cas9 enzymes for combinatorial genetic screens. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 179–189 (2018).
Shen, J. P. et al. Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions. Nat. Methods 14, 573–576 (2017).
Han, K. et al. Synergistic drug combinations for cancer identified in a CRISPR screen for pairwise genetic interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 463–474 (2017).
Gier, R. A. et al. High-performance CRISPR-Cas12a genome editing for combinatorial genetic screening. Nat. Commun. 11, 3455 (2020).
Horlbeck, M. A. et al. Mapping the genetic landscape of human cells. Cell 174, 953–967.e22 (2018).
Dede, M., McLaughlin, M., Kim, E. & Hart, T. Multiplex enCas12a screens detect functional buffering among paralogs otherwise masked in monogenic Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol 21, 262 (2020).
Replogle, J. M. et al. Combinatorial single-cell CRISPR screens by direct guide RNA capture and targeted sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 954–961 (2020).
Ward., H. csbio/orthrus: Protocol Release (v0.4.3.3). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4827171 (2021).
Zamanighomi, M. et al. GEMINI: a variational Bayesian approach to identify genetic interactions from combinatorial CRISPR screens. Genome Biol. 20, 137 (2019).
Aregger, M. et al. Application of CHyMErA Cas9-Cas12a combinatorial genome-editing platform for genetic interaction mapping and gene fragment deletion screening. Nat. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00595-1 (2021).
Imkeller, K., Ambrosi, G., Boutros, M. & Huber, W. gscreend: modelling asymmetric count ratios in CRISPR screens to decrease experiment size and improve phenotype detection. Genome Biol 21, 53 (2020).
Hart, T., Brown, K. R., Sircoulomb, F., Rottapel, R. & Moffat, J. Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 733 (2014).
Boucher, B. & Jenna, S. Genetic interaction networks: better understand to better predict. Front. Genet. 4, 290 (2013).
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
Yang, Y. H. et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e15 (2002).

Analysis of combinatorial CRISPR screens with the Orthrus scoring pipeline

Supplementary information

推荐阅读