The spontaneous location recognition task for assessing spatial pattern separation and memory across a delay in rats and mice

Amy C. Reichelt, Cecilia P. Kramar, Olivia R. Ghosh-Swaby, Paul A. S. Sheppard, Brianne A. Kent, Pedro Bekinschtein, Lisa M. Saksida, Timothy J. Bussey

Published: 2021-11-04 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00627-w

Spatial Pattern Separation

Spontaneous Location Recognition

Memory Assessment

Rodent Behavior

Neuropsychiatric Disorders

AI 解读

Fabrication of angstrom-scale two-dimensional channels for mass transport

Efficient and strand-specific profiling of replicating chromatin with enrichment and sequencing of protein-associated nascent DNA in mammalian cells

The eINTACT method for studying nuclear changes in host plant cells targeted by bacterial effectors in native infection contexts

Rapid reaction optimization by robust and economical quantitative benchtop19F NMR spectroscopy

Profiling native pulmonary basement membrane stiffness using atomic force microscopy

Photoimmunotechnology as a powerful biological tool for molecular-based elimination of target cells and microbes, including bacteria, fungi and viruses

Measuring key human carbohydrate digestive enzyme activities using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection

Neural cell isolation from adult macaques for high-throughput analyses and neurosphere cultures

Preparation, validation and use of a vasoactive tryptophan-derived hydroperoxide and relevant control compounds

Neuronal subtype-specific growth cone and soma purification from mammalian CNS via fractionation and fluorescent sorting for subcellular analyses and spatial mapping of local transcriptomes and proteomes

查看全部

Sections

Figures

References

Keeping similar memories distinct from one another is a critical cognitive process without which we would have difficulty functioning in everyday life. Memories are thought to be kept distinct through the computational mechanism of pattern separation, whi
Introduction
Materials
Procedure
Troubleshooting
Timing
Anticipated results
- Statistical analysis
- References
References
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. in Organization of Memory (eds Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W.) 381–403 (Academic Press, 1972).
Rolls, E. The mechanisms for pattern completion and pattern separation in the hippocampus. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7, 74 (2013).
Marr, D. & Thach, W. T. A theory of cerebellar cortex. in From the Retina to the Neocortex (ed. Vaina, L.) 11–50 (Springer, 1991).
Frankland, P. W., Cestari, V., Filipkowski, R. K., McDonald, R. J. & Silva, A. J. The dorsal hippocampus is essential for context discrimination but not for contextual conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 112, 863 (1998).
Gilbert, P. E., Kesner, R. P. & DeCoteau, W. E. Memory for spatial location: role of the hippocampus in mediating spatial pattern separation. J. Neurosci. 18, 804–810 (1998).
McDonald, R. J. & White, N. M. Hippocampal and nonhippocampal contributions to place learning in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 109, 579 (1995).
McTighe, S. M., Mar, A. C., Romberg, C., Bussey, T. J. & Saksida, L. M. A new touchscreen test of pattern separation: effect of hippocampal lesions. Neuroreport 20, 881–885 (2009).
Kent, B. A., Hvoslef-Eide, M., Saksida, L. M. & Bussey, T. J. The representational–hierarchical view of pattern separation: not just hippocampus, not just space, not just memory? Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 129, 99–106 (2016).
Bekinschtein, P. et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor interacts with adult-born immature cells in the dentate gyrus during consolidation of overlapping memories. Hippocampus 24, 905–911 (2014).
Clelland, C. et al. A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. Science 325, 210–213 (2009).
Creer, D. J., Romberg, C., Saksida, L. M., van Praag, H. & Bussey, T. J. Running enhances spatial pattern separation in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2367–2372 (2010).
Kheirbek, M. A., Klemenhagen, K. C., Sahay, A. & Hen, R. Neurogenesis and generalization: a new approach to stratify and treat anxiety disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1613–1620 (2012).
Nakashiba, T. et al. Young dentate granule cells mediate pattern separation, whereas old granule cells facilitate pattern completion. Cell 149, 188–201 (2012).
Sahay, A. et al. Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature 472, 466–470 (2011).
Tronel, S. et al. Adult-born neurons are necessary for extended contextual discrimination. Hippocampus 22, 292–298 (2012).
Quian Quiroga, R. No pattern separation in the human hippocampus. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 994–1007 (2020).
Suthana, N., Ekstrom, A. D., Yassa, M. A. & Stark, C. Pattern separation in the human hippocampus: response to Quiroga. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 423–424 (2021).
Berlyne, D. E. Novelty and curiosity as determinants of exploratory behaviour. Br. J. Psychol. 41, 68 (1950).
Bekinschtein, P. et al. BDNF in the dentate gyrus is required for consolidation of “pattern-separated” memories. Cell Rep. 5, 759–768 (2013).
Kent, B. A. et al. The orexigenic hormone acyl-ghrelin increases adult hippocampal neurogenesis and enhances pattern separation. Psychoneuroendocrinology 51, 431–439 (2015).
Miranda, M. et al. NMDA receptors and BDNF are necessary for discrimination of overlapping spatial and non-spatial memories in perirhinal cortex and hippocampus. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 155, 337–343 (2018).
Buyukata, C., Vukalo, M., Xu, T. J., Khore, M. A. & Reichelt, A. C. Impact of high sucrose diets on the discrimination of spatial and object memories with overlapping features. Physiol. Behav. 192, 127–133 (2018).
Gilchrist, C. P. et al. Hippocampal neurogenesis and memory in adolescence following intrauterine growth restriction. Hippocampus 31, 321–334 (2021).
Hueston, C. M. et al. Chronic interleukin-1β in the dorsal hippocampus impairs behavioural pattern separation. Brain Behav. Immun. 74, 252–264 (2018).
Reichelt, A. C., Morris, M. J. & Westbrook, R. F. Daily access to sucrose impairs aspects of spatial memory tasks reliant on pattern separation and neural proliferation in rats. Learn. Mem. 23, 386–390 (2016).
Bonafina, A. et al. GDNF and GFRα1 are required for proper integration of adult-born hippocampal neurons. Cell Rep. 29, 4308–4319. e4304 (2019).
Morales, C. et al. Dentate gyrus somatostatin cells are required for contextual discrimination during episodic memory encoding. Cereb. Cortex 31, 1046–1059 (2021).
Clark, R. E., Zola, S. M. & Squire, L. R. Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 20, 8853–8860 (2000).
Dix, S. L. & Aggleton, J. P. Extending the spontaneous preference test of recognition: evidence of object-location and object-context recognition. Behav. Brain Res. 99, 191–200 (1999).
Gilbert, P. E., Kesner, R. P. & Lee, I. Dissociating hippocampal subregions: a double dissociation between dentate gyrus and CA1. Hippocampus 11, 626–636 (2001).
Oomen, C. A. et al. The touchscreen operant platform for testing working memory and pattern separation in rats and mice. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2006–2021 (2013).
Kim, C. H. et al. Trial-unique, delayed nonmatching-to-location (TUNL) touchscreen testing for mice: sensitivity to dorsal hippocampal dysfunction. Psychopharmacology 232, 3935–3945 (2015).
Talpos, J., McTighe, S., Dias, R., Saksida, L. & Bussey, T. Trial-unique, delayed nonmatching-to-location (TUNL): a novel, highly hippocampus-dependent automated touchscreen test of location memory and pattern separation. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 94, 341–352 (2010).
Hunsaker, M. R., Rosenberg, J. S. & Kesner, R. P. The role of the dentate gyrus, CA3a, b, and CA3c for detecting spatial and environmental novelty. Hippocampus 18, 1064–1073 (2008).
Van Goethem, N., Schreiber, R., Newman‐Tancredi, A., Varney, M. & Prickaerts, J. Divergent effects of the ‘biased’5‐HT 1 A receptor agonists F15599 and F13714 in a novel object pattern separation task. Br. J. Pharmacol. 172, 2532–2543 (2015).
van Goethem, N. P., van Hagen, B. T. & Prickaerts, J. Assessing spatial pattern separation in rodents using the object pattern separation task. Nat. Protoc. 13, 1763–1792 (2018).
Van Hagen, B., Van Goethem, N., Lagatta, D. & Prickaerts, J. The object pattern separation (OPS) task: a behavioral paradigm derived from the object recognition task. Behav. Brain Res. 285, 44–52 (2015).
Prusky, G. T., Harker, K. T., Douglas, R. M. & Whishaw, I. Q. Variation in visual acuity within pigmented, and between pigmented and albino rat strains. Behav. Brain Res. 136, 339–348 (2002).
Brown, R. E. & Wong, A. A. The influence of visual ability on learning and memory performance in 13 strains of mice. Learn. Mem. 14, 134–144 (2007).
Wong, A. A. & Brown, R. E. Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice. Genes Brain Behav. 5, 389–403 (2006).
Abbott, K. N., Morris, M. J., Westbrook, R. F. & Reichelt, A. C. Sex-specific effects of daily exposure to sucrose on spatial memory performance in male and female rats, and implications for estrous cycle stage. Physiol. Behav. 162, 52–60 (2016).
Shansky, R. M. Are hormones a “female problem” for animal research? Science 364, 825–826 (2019).
Costa, R., Tamascia, M. L., Nogueira, M. D., Casarini, D. E. & Marcondes, F. K. Handling of adolescent rats improves learning and memory and decreases anxiety. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 51, 548–553 (2012).
Rebouças, R. C. & Schmidek, W. R. Handling and isolation in three strains of rats affect open field, exploration, hoarding and predation. Physiol. Behav. 62, 1159–1164 (1997).
Gouveia, K. & Hurst, J. L. Optimising reliability of mouse performance in behavioural testing: the major role of non-aversive handling. Sci. Rep. 7, 44999 (2017).
Deacon, R. M. Housing, husbandry and handling of rodents for behavioral experiments. Nat. Protoc. 1, 936 (2006).
Heiderstadt, K., McLaughlin, R., Wrighe, D., Walker, S. & Gomez-Sanchez, C. The effect of chronic food and water restriction on open-field behaviour and serum corticosterone levels in rats. Lab. Anim. 34, 20–28 (2000).
Brown, K. J. & Grunberg, N. E. Effects of housing on male and female rats: crowding stresses males but calms females. Physiol. Behav. 58, 1085–1089 (1995).
Kappel, S., Hawkins, P. & Mendl, M. T. To group or not to group? Good practice for housing male laboratory mice. Animals 7, 88 (2017).
Gallistel, C. R. The Organization of Learning (MIT Press, 1990).
Sousa, N., Almeida, O. & Wotjak, C. A hitchhiker’s guide to behavioral analysis in laboratory rodents. Genes Brain Behav. 5, 5–24 (2006).
Walsh, R. N. & Cummins, R. A. The open-field test: a critical review. Psychol. Bull. 83, 482 (1976).
Simon, P., Dupuis, R. & Costentin, J. Thigmotaxis as an index of anxiety in mice. Influence of dopaminergic transmissions. Behav. Brain Res. 61, 59–64 (1994).
Kolb, B. Some tests of response habituation in rats with discrete lesions to the orbital or medial frontal cortex. Can. J. Psychol. 28, 260 (1974).
Klein, J. et al. Lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex and the subthalamic nucleus selectively affect depression-like behavior in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 213, 73–81 (2010).
Godsil, B. P., Stefanacci, L. & Fanselow, M. S. Bright light suppresses hyperactivity induced by excitotoxic dorsal hippocampus lesions in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 119, 1339–1352 (2005).
Broadbent, N. J., Gaskin, S., Squire, L. R. & Clark, R. E. Object recognition memory and the rodent hippocampus. Learn. Mem. 17, 5–11 (2010).
Antunes, M. & Biala, G. The novel object recognition memory: neurobiology, test procedure, and its modifications. Cogn. Process. 13, 93–110 (2012).
Pennington, Z. T. et al. ezTrack: an open-source video analysis pipeline for the investigation of animal behavior. Sci. Rep. 9, 19979 (2019).
Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1281–1289 (2018).
Sridhar, V. H., Roche, D. G. & Gingins, S. Tracktor: image-based automated tracking of animal movement and behaviour. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 815–820 (2019).
Drai, D., Kafkafi, N., Benjamini, Y., Elmer, G. & Golani, I. Rats and mice share common ethologically relevant parameters of exploratory behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 133–140 (2001).
Akkerman, S. et al. Object recognition testing: methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures. Behav. Brain Res. 232, 335–347 (2012).

The spontaneous location recognition task for assessing spatial pattern separation and memory across a delay in rats and mice

Supplementary information

推荐阅读