Genetic Manipulation of Klebsiella pneumoniae
Drew A. Pariseau, Drew A. Pariseau, Brooke E. Ring, Brooke E. Ring, Saroj Khadka, Saroj Khadka, Laura A. Mike, Laura A. Mike
Abstract
Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium commonly found in the human intestine. Although it typically exists as part of the normal flora, it can also cause healthcare-associated infections with severe consequences. Understanding the specific genes responsible for its virulence through genetic manipulation is crucial for potential therapeutic interventions. However, manipulating K. pneumoniae presents challenges due to its exopolysaccharide capsule. This article presents a comprehensive collection of protocols designed to facilitate the genetic manipulation of K. pneumoniae. By following these protocols, researchers will acquire the necessary skills to prepare electrocompetent cells, utilize electroporation for efficient plasmid DNA introduction, construct isogenic mutants using the λ Red recombinase system, and generate a complementation vector for restoring the phenotypic traits of knockout strains. These protocols provide valuable tools and techniques to navigate the intricacies associated with studying and modifying K. pneumoniae. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Basic Protocol 1 : Preparing electrocompetent K. pneumoniae cells
Alternate Protocol 1 : Preparing electrocompetent K. pneumoniae cells for recombineering
Basic Protocol 2 : Transforming K. pneumoniae using electroporation
Basic Protocol 3 : Constructing isogenic mutants in K. pneumoniae using the λ Red recombinase system
Support Protocol 1 : Confirming a knockout via colony PCR
Support Protocol 2 : Verifying absence of secondary mutations
Basic Protocol 4 : Generating unmarked knockout mutants in K. pneumoniae using the pFLP plasmid
Basic Protocol 5 : Constructing a complementation vector for K. pneumoniae
INTRODUCTION
Klebsiella pneumoniae is a significant human pathogen known for causing a wide range of infectious diseases, including pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and bloodstream infections (Wang et al., 2020). It is also well known for propelling the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae , posing a major challenge in the clinical setting (Hu et al., 2021). Genetic manipulation studies of K. pneumoniae have gained considerable attention due to their potential to provide valuable insights into the pathogenic determinants and mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in this bacterium. It is important to note that although considerable progress has been made in the genetic manipulation of K. pneumoniae , there are still challenges and limitations.
The presence of an exopolysaccharide capsule in K. pneumoniae complicates the genetic manipulation of K. pneumoniae by reducing transformation efficiencies (Fournet-Fayard et al., 1995). Hypermucoviscous K. pneumoniae strains pose a continued challenge due to the high abundance of capsular polysaccharides (CPS) on the cell surface, resulting in low transformation efficiency (Park & Ko, 2023). However, one major hurdle persisting in the genetic manipulation of K. pneumoniae is the absence of standardized protocols tailored for various genetic techniques using hypervirulent strains. Overcoming this challenge will involve optimizing existing protocols to effectively address the specific requirements and obstacles associated with hypervirulent strains.
Here, we provide protocols for efficient genetic manipulation procedures using a hypervirulent strain of K. pneumoniae , KPPR1 (Broberg et al., 2014; Lawlor et al., 2005; Standiford et al., 1999). The protocols provide the foundational tools necessary to investigate the significance of a gene or genetic element of interest that is altering a phenotype of interest in K. pneumoniae. Basic Protocol 1 and Alternate Protocol 1 describe the preparation of electrocompetent K. pneumoniae cells. Basic Protocol 2 details the transformation of plasmid DNA into competent cells through electroporation. Basic Protocol 3 describes the use of a plasmid containing the λ Red recombinase system to generate an isogenic mutant strain. Support Protocols 1 and 2 dictate the methods used to validate that a targeted mutation was made with no off-site effects. Basic Protocol 4 describes the usage of FLP recombinase to generate a clean knockout. Finally, Basic Protocol 5 explains the construction of complementation vectors to restore the phenotype of a mutant.
CAUTION: K. pneumoniae is a Biosafety Level 2 pathogen, and the Escherichia coli strains used in this protocol are all a Biosafety Level 1 pathogens. Hazards and precautions associated with this protocol include performing electroporation with high-voltage electrical pulses, utilizing liquid nitrogen or dry ice for flash freezing, and maintaining sterile techniques when handling bacterial cultures. Follow all appropriate guidelines and regulations for the use and handling of pathogenic microorganisms.
NOTE : All protocols involving animals must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate Animal Care and Use Committee and must follow regulations for the care and use of laboratory animals. Appropriate informed consent is necessary for obtaining and use of human study material.
Basic Protocol 1: PREPARING ELECTROCOMPETENT K. pneumoniae CELLS
This protocol is adapted and optimized from previously published methodologies to be an efficient method for the preparation of electrocompetent K. pneumoniae cells (Bachman et al., 2015). Competent cells are essential for genetic manipulation and transformation procedures (Basic Protocol 2). Electrocompetent cells can take up foreign DNA through electroporation, allowing the introduction of plasmids, gene knockouts, or other genetic modifications. In brief, this protocol provides step-by-step instructions for the growth of K. pneumoniae to mid-exponential phase, preparation of competent cells, and storage of the electrocompetent cells. The resulting electrocompetent K. pneumoniae cells can be used in various molecular biology applications.
Materials
-
Frozen glycerol stock of K. pneumoniae reference strains ATCC 43816 (KPPR1) or other strain(s) of interest
-
Low-salt LB agar (see recipe)
-
Low-salt LB broth (see recipe)
-
0.5 mM EDTA, pH 8 (see recipe)
-
1 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 (see recipe), ice cold, sterile
-
Sterile ultrapure water, ice cold
-
10% (v/v) glycerol, ice cold, sterile
-
Liquid nitrogen
-
Static incubator (e.g., Thermo Scientific, Heratherm), 30°C
-
17 × 100-mm aeration culture tubes (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 21-131)
-
Shaking incubator (e.g., New Brunswick Innova 44), 37°C
-
125-ml Erlenmeyer flask (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 10-040D)
-
1.7-ml disposable cuvettes (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 14-955-127)
-
Spectrophotometer (e.g., Thermo Fisher GENESYS 30)
-
Ice bucket with ice
-
50-ml conical tubes (USA Scientific, cat. no. 5622-7261)
-
Refrigerated centrifuge (e.g., Eppendorf centrifuge 5425R)
-
1.7-ml sterile microcentrifuge tubes (Genesee Scientific, cat. No. 24-282C)
-
−80°C freezer
Culture and growth conditions for mid-log phase
1.Streak K. pneumoniae strain KPPR1 from the −80°C glycerol stock onto a low-salt LB agar plate and incubate overnight at 30°C.
2.Select a single colony of KPPR1 and inoculate into two culture tubes containing 3 ml of low-salt LB broth and 0.5 µM EDTA. Incubate the culture overnight at 37°C with shaking (200 rpm).
3.Prepare a sterile 125-ml flask for the next day by adding 50 ml low-salt LB broth and place it in the 37°C incubator overnight.
4.Aseptically remove 1 ml from the flask of low-salt LB broth and pipet it into a cuvette to serve as a blank for step 6.
5.Inoculate the sterile 125-ml flask containing 50 ml low-salt LB broth with 0.5 µM EDTA and antibiotics, if required. Swirl to mix, add 0.5 ml of the overnight culture, and place the flask in the 37°C incubator with shaking (200 rpm).
6.Measure the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) by spectrophotometry starting at 2 hr and then at intervals of 0.5 to 1 hr until the culture reaches an OD600 of 0.5-0.6.Bacterial growth can be measured by aseptically removing 1 ml of culture, pipetting it into a cuvette, and reading the absorbance at 600 nm.
Preparation of electrocompetent cells
7.Remove the flask from the incubator and place it on ice for a minimum of 30 min.
8.Transfer the chilled culture to the sterile, cold 50-ml conical tube and centrifuge 15 min at 14,000 × g , 4°C.
9.Decant the supernatant and resuspend the cells in a total volume of 20 ml of ice-cold sterile 1 mM HEPES pH 7.4.

10.Centrifuge the 50-ml conical tube(s) for 15 min at 14,000 × g , 4°C. Decant the supernatant and resuspend the cells with 20 ml of ice-cold sterile ultrapure water.
11.Centrifuge the tube(s) for 15 min at 14,000 × g , 4°C. Decant the supernatant and resuspend the cells with 4 ml of ice-cold sterile 10% glycerol.
12.Centrifuge the for 15 min at 14,000 × g , 4°C. Decant the liquid carefully and resuspend cells with ice-cold sterile 10% glycerol to a final volume of 0.5 ml, including any residual glycerol from the previous spin.
13.At this point, the competent cells may be electroporated by proceeding to Basic Protocol 2, step 2, or may be saved for later use by following steps 14 and 15 below.
14.Label and then aliquot 50- to 300-μl cell suspensions into sterile 1.7-ml microcentrifuge tubes kept on ice.
15.Flash-freeze the microcentrifuge tubes using liquid nitrogen and store the cells at −80°C.
Alternate Protocol 1: PREPARING ELECTROCOMPETENT K. pneumoniae CELLS FOR RECOMBINEERING
This protocol has been optimized from previously published methodologies and details the preparation of electrocompetent cells from KPPR1 containing pKD46-spr for efficient electroporation followed by λ Red recombineering (Bachman et al., 2015; Datsenko & Wanner, 2000). Unlike Basic Protocol 1, the preparation of KPPR1 containing pKD46-spr involves a temperature-sensitive origin of replication and an arabinose-inducible promoter, essential for generating isogenic mutants using the λ Red recombination system. The procedure includes overnight culture growth, cell centrifugation, resuspension in HEPES buffer and glycerol, and final storage at −80°C. Following this method ensures that the electroporation efficiency is optimized for subsequent genetic manipulation studies.
Additional Materials (also see Basic Protocol 1)
-
K. pneumoniae ATCC 43816 (KPPR1) containing pKD46-spr
-
Low-salt LB agar plates (see recipe) with 50 µg/ml spectinomycin (see recipe)
-
50 mg/ml spectinomycin (see recipe)
-
50 mM L-arabinose, sterile filtered (see recipe)
-
Shaking incubator (e.g., USA Scientific, New Brunswick Innova 44), 30°C
-
250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 10-040F)
-
250-ml Nalgene bottles, sterile (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 02-923-7), prechilled on ice
Culture and growth conditions
1.Streak K. pneumoniae strain KPPR1 containing pKD46-spr from the −80°C glycerol stock onto a low-salt LB-spectinomycin (50 µg/ml) agar plate and incubate overnight at 30°C.
2.Inoculate a single colony of KPPR1 containing pKD46-spr into two culture tubes each containing 3 ml of low-salt LB broth, 0.5 µM EDTA, and 50 µg/ml spectinomycin. Incubate the culture overnight at 30°C with continuous shaking (200 rpm).
3.Prepare two sterile 250-ml flasks with 125 ml low-salt LB broth for each flask and incubate at 37°C overnight.
4.Aseptically remove 1 ml from both 250-ml flasks containing low-salt LB broth and pipet it into a cuvette to serve as a blank for step 6.
5.Inoculate the sterile 250-ml flasks containing 125 ml of low-salt LB broth with 0.5 µM EDTA, spectinomycin (50 µg/ml), and 50 mM sterile-filtered L-arabinose. Swirl to mix, and then add 1 ml of the overnight culture and place the flask in the 30°C incubator with shaking (200 rpm).
6.Measure the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) starting 3 hr and then at intervals of 0.5-1 hr until the culture reaches an OD600 of 0.5-0.6.Bacterial growth can be measured by aseptically removing 1 ml of culture, pipetting it into a cuvette, and reading the absorbance at 600 nm.
Preparing and storing competent cells
7.Place the culture on ice for a minimum of 30 min.
8.Transfer the chilled culture to a prechilled sterile 250-ml Nalgene bottle and centrifuge 15 min at 14,000 × g , 4°C.
9.Decant the supernatant and resuspend cells in a total volume of 100 ml of ice-cold sterile 1 mM HEPES, pH 7.4.
10.Centrifuge the 50-ml conical tube(s) for 15 min at 14,000 × g , 4°C. Decant the supernatant and resuspend the cells in a total volume of 100 ml of ice-cold sterile ultra-pure water.
11.Centrifuge the tube(s) for 15 min at 14,000 × g , 4°C. Decant the supernatant and resuspend the cells in a total volume of 20 ml of ice-cold sterile 10% glycerol.
12.Centrifuge the tube(s) for 15 min at 14,000 × g , 4°C. Decant the liquid carefully and resuspend cells with ice-cold sterile 10% glycerol to a final volume of 2 ml, including any residual glycerol from the previous spin.
13.Aliquot 50-300 μl of cell suspensions into sterile 1.7-ml microcentrifuge tubes; keep on ice for immediate use or proceed to the next step for storage.
14.Flash-freeze the microcentrifuge tubes using liquid nitrogen or dry ice and ethanol and store the cells at −80°C for 3-6 months.
Basic Protocol 2: TRANSFORMING K. pneumoniae USING ELECTROPORATION
This protocol describes a method for introducing DNA into competent K. pneumoniae cells using electroporation. Electroporation is a widely employed technique that enables the efficient and precise delivery of foreign DNA into bacterial cells. By utilizing this method, researchers can genetically manipulate K. pneumoniae for various applications, such as gene expression studies and the generation of recombinant strains. Briefly, plasmid DNA is added to competent K. pneumoniae cells, which are pulsed with an electroporator and allowed to recover at 30°C for 1-2 hr. The recovered cells are then plated on a low-salt LB-antibiotic plate and incubated overnight for the identification of colonies that have successfully taken up the plasmid. Throughout the procedure, stringent aseptic techniques are followed to prevent contamination. By following this protocol, researchers can achieve efficient and reliable transformation of K. pneumoniae using electroporation, facilitating various genetic studies and applications.
Materials
-
Electrocompetent K. pneumoniae cells (KPPR1 or other strain of interest; Basic Protocol 1 or Alternate Protocol 1)
-
10% (v/v) glycerol, sterile
-
1-5 μl (10 pg-100 ng) plasmid DNA (e.g., pACYC184)
-
Low-salt LB broth (see recipe)
-
Low-salt LB agar (see recipe) supplemented with appropriate antibiotics
-
25-mm-diameter mixed cellulose esters (MCE) membrane (Millipore Sigma, cat. no. VSWP02500)
-
1.7-ml microcentrifuge tubes, sterile (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 24-282C)
-
0.1-cm electroporation cuvette (USA Scientific, cat. no. 9104-1050)
-
Xcell gene pulser (Bio-Rad, cat. no. 1652662)
-
Shaking incubator (e.g., New Brunswick Innova 44), 30°C
-
100 × 15-mm petri dishes (USA Scientific, cat. no. 8609-0010)
Dialyzing plasmid DNA sample and electroporating
1.Thaw three vials each containing 50 μl of electrocompetent cells from the −80°C freezer on ice for 5-10 min.
2.Label 1.7-ml microcentrifuge tubes: a negative control tube (NC), a positive control tube (PC), and the tube receiving the plasmid DNA (PD).
3.Add 100-200 ng of purified plasmid DNA suspended in sterile water to the 50 μl of competent K. pneumoniae cells, usually 5 μl. For the negative control (no DNA), add an equal volume of 10% glycerol and for the positive control, add 1 μl of a plasmid that has been established to transform efficiently (e.g., pCR2.1, pBAD18, or pACYC184) to one vial of competent cells.
4.Incubate the samples on ice for 30 min and place the 0.1-cm electroporation cuvettes on ice.
5.Transfer the competent cells/DNA mixture to the 0.1-cm electroporation cuvette and electroporate at 1.8 kV, 400 Ω, 25 μF.
6.Immediately add 500 μl low-salt LB broth to the 0.1-cm electroporation cuvette and then transfer the entire sample to the corresponding 1.7-ml microcentrifuge tube labeled in step 2.
Recovering and plating of transformed cells
7.Place the tubes in the 30°C shaking incubator for 1-2 hr.
8.Plate 100 μl and 10 μl of the sample onto low-salt LB agar plates supplemented with appropriate antibiotics for selection purposes.
9.Plate 200 μl of each of the positive and negative control onto two low-salt LB-2% agar plates supplemented with appropriate antibiotics.
10.Incubate the plates overnight at 30°C.
11.Remove the plates from the incubator. Cells transformed with the plasmid DNA will have colony-forming units (CFUs) on the LB-antibiotic plates, whereas the negative controls should not have any CFUs.
Basic Protocol 3: CONSTRUCTING ISOGENIC MUTANTS IN K. pneumoniae USING THE Λ RED RECOMBINASE SYSTEM
This protocol has been adapted and optimized from previously published methodologies and describes the step-by-step procedure for generating isogenic mutants in K. pneumoniae using the λ Red recombinase system (Bachman et al., 2015; Datsenko & Wanner, 2000). The pKD46-spr plasmid encodes the λ Red system, which enables accurate and efficient homologous recombination between the knockout antibiotic cassette and a specific gene site in the chromosome. Briefly, this protocol outlines PCR amplification of the kanamycin cassette from the pKD4 plasmid, purification of PCR products, transformation via electroporation, and selection of colonies with the generated knockout with the kanamycin cassette. The expected outcome is the generation of desired mutants with an antibiotic-resistance cassette.
Materials
-
Purified pKD46-spr plasmid (1 pg-10 ng; Addgene, cat. no. 62656)
-
10 mM dNTPs (Promega, cat. no. U1511)
-
OneTaq Quick-Load DNA Polymerase and appropriate buffer (New England Biolabs, cat. no. M0509L)
-
Nuclease-free water, room temperature and 42°C
-
Agarose type I, low EEO (Millipore Sigma, cat. no. A6013)
-
1× Tris/acetate/EDTA (TAE) buffer (see recipe)
-
Biotium GelRed nucleic acid gel stain, 10,000× (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. NC9594719)
-
Quick-Load Purple 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder (New England Biolabs, cat. no. N0550L)
-
GenCatch PCR cleanup kit (Epoch Life Science, cat. no. 2360250)
-
DpnI (New England Biolabs, cat. no. R0176L)
-
Low-salt LB broth (see recipe)
-
25 mg/ml kanamycin (see recipe)
-
Low-salt LB agar plates (see recipe) with 25 µg/ml kanamycin
-
3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2 (see recipe)
-
100% ethanol
-
70% (v/v) ethanol, ice cold
-
50% (v/v) glycerol, sterile
-
Sterile PCR tubes
-
Thermal cycler (e.g., Applied Biosystems Pro-flex 3 × 32-well PCR System)
-
Horizontal gel casting system including, caster, combs, gel box, and power supply (Bio-Rad, cat. no. 1640300)
-
Microwave
-
UV transilluminator (e.g., D.A.I. Scientific Equipment, cat. no. E3000)
-
1.7-ml microcentrifuge tubes, sterile (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 24-282C)
-
Fume hood
-
1.8-ml cryovials (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 24-203P)
PCR amplification of the kanamycin cassette
1.Design oligonucleotide primers specific for the P1 and P2 sites on pKD4 for the amplification of the kanamycin cassette. Primer examples can be found in Table 1 for the example gene, rmpD (Khadka et al., 2023).
Oligonucleotide primers | Sequence |
---|---|
Forward primer (P1) | 5′-AAGAAATGGTTGATGAAAGATGTCTCATGCTAGGTATTTAGAAAAAAAGGGGAGGAGGGG GTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC-3′ |
Reverse primer (P2) | 5′-ATGCAATATGCATACTTATCTGCCAACTAAAATTGTCGTGAGTTATATACCGCGCTGATAATGGGAATTAGCCATGGTCC-3′ |
- a
P1 and P2 sites of pKD4 are underlined and boldface.
- b
Additional primer examples for making gene deletions are detailed in Table S1 of Mike et al. (2021).
2.Prepare working stocks of primers at 50 μM in nuclease-free water.
3.Set up six 50-μl PCR reactions (300 μl total) containing the following:
- 2 μl purified pKD4 (1 pg-10 ng)
- 0.2 μl of each 50 μM primer
- 1 μl of 10 mM dNTPs
- 10 μl of 5× OneTaq Standard Reaction Buffer
- 0.25 μl Taq polymerase
- 36.6 μl nuclease-free water.
4.Set up the following conditions on the thermocycler:
Initial step: | 5 min | 94°C (denaturation) |
30 cycles: | 1 min | 94°C (extension) |
1 min | 51°C (annealing) | |
30 s | 68°C (extension) | |
Final step: | 5 min | 68°C (extension). |
5.Prepare a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel by dissolving 0.24 g agarose in 30 ml of 1× TAE buffer. Microwave on high until fully dissolved.
6.Add 1.2 μl GelRed into the slightly cooled 1% agarose gel. Pour the gel into a gel apparatus, add the gel combs, and allow it to fully polymerize.
7.Pipet 5 μl of each PCR reaction and the DNA ladder into the polymerized 1% agarose gel. Run at 130 V for ∼25 min.
8.Visualize the gel on a DNA transilluminator to confirm that the PCR product is amplified at 1496 base pairs.
Preparation of recombinase substrate
9.Pool together the six PCR reactions containing identical PCR products (∼300 μl/gene) into a sterile 1.7-ml microcentrifuge tube.
10.Purify the pooled PCR products using a GenCatch PCR Cleanup Kit. Elute with 35 μl prewarmed nuclease-free water at the final step.
11.Digest the purified PCR products with DpnI by adding 3.5 μl of 10× CutSmart reaction buffer (supplied with the enzyme) and 2 μl DpnI to the pooled purified PCR samples and placing them into the thermal cycler for 2-8 hr at 37°C, and then heat-inactivate at 80°C for 20 min.
12.Purify digestions using a GenCatch PCR Cleanup Kit as described above; however, elute with 15 μl sterile nuclease-free water at the final step.
13.Store the purified product at −20°C.
Electroporation and selection for recombinant clones
14.Thaw 50 μl of competent KPPR1 pKD46-spr competent on ice.
15.Add 6 μl (∼1/2 eluate) of the purified and digested PCR product (from step 13) to the thawed competent cells. Gently mix the mixture by flicking the tube.
16.Perform electroporation following the steps outlined in Basic Protocol 2, steps 4-9.
17.Allow cells to recover in 500 μl of low-salt LB broth at 30°C with shaking for 3 hr in sterile 1.7-ml microcentrifuge tubes.
18.Plate 200 μl of the cells onto low-salt LB agar plates supplemented with 25 µg/ml kanamycin. Incubate the plates at 37°C overnight. Patch any potential mutant colonies on LB agar plates with 25 µg/ml kanamycin and then confirm the knockout via colony PCR (Support Protocol 1).
Recovery and concentration of cells
19.Examine the agar plates the next day. If no colonies appear on the agar plates, recover the remaining cells by centrifugation and remove the supernatant. Resuspend the pelleted cells with 100 μl low-salt LB and plate as described in step 18.
20.Examine the new agar plates the next day. If there are still no colonies visible, concentrate the remaining purified and digested PCR product as follows: bring reactions to 125 μl with ultrapure water, add 12.5 μl of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2), mix well, and add 375 μl ice-cold 100% ethanol. Incubate at −80°C for 30 min and centrifuge 10 min at 16,000 × g , 4°C.
21.Carefully remove all liquid with a 150-μl pipet. Add 500 μl of ice-cold 70% ethanol to the pellet. Briefly vortex the tube to ensure proper mixing and then centrifuge 10 min at 16,000 × g , 4°C.
22.Carefully remove all liquid with a small pipet as before. Place the tube with the cap open in a fume hood for 10-20 min, allowing the ethanol to evaporate (do not over-dry).
23.Add 50 μl of thawed pKD46-spr cells to the dried pellet and then incubate on ice and electroporate as described in step 16.
Storage of isogenic mutants
24.Select a single colony of the transformed mutant strain, inoculate into one culture tube containing 3 ml of low-salt LB broth with 25 µg/ml kanamycin, and incubate the culture overnight at 37°C with shaking (200 rpm).
25.Pipet 0.5-0.9 ml of the overnight culture into a 1.8-ml cryovial. Add an equal volume of sterile 50% glycerol to the culture in the cryovial and mix well. Store the cryovial containing the culture and glycerol mixture in the −80°C freezer for long-term storage.
Support Protocol 1: CONFIRMING A KNOCKOUT VIA COLONY PCR
This protocol outlines a procedure for efficient screening and selection of knockout mutants generated from Basic Protocol 3 using colony PCR. By lysing of bacterial cells, PCR amplification, and visualization of PCR products, this approach enables high-throughput and reliable screening of bacterial colonies, facilitating the identification of target genetic manipulations. This protocol provides a detailed step-by-step guide to ensure successful screening and selection of knockout mutants.
Materials
-
K. pneumoniae strain KPPR1 with an isogenic mutant (Basic Protocol 3)
-
Wild-type K. pneumoniae KPPR1
-
Ultrapure water
-
Low-salt LB agar (see recipe) with 25 µg/ml kanamycin (see recipe)
-
Forward and reverse primers specific for DNA sequence of interest
-
10 mM dNTPs (Promega, cat. no. U1511)
-
OneTaq Quick-Load DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, cat. no. M0509L)
-
Nuclease-free water
-
PCR tubes, sterile
-
Toothpicks, sterile
-
30°C static incubator (e.g., Fisher Scientific, Heratherm™)
-
Microwave
-
−20°C and −80°C freezers
-
PCR tubes, sterile
-
Thermal cycler (e.g., Applied Biosystems Pro-flex 3 × 32-well PCR System)
-
Horizontal gel casting system including, caster, combs, gel box, and power supply (Bio-Rad, cat. no. 1640300)
-
Accuris UV transilluminator (e.g., D.A.I. Scientific Equipment, cat. no. E3000)
-
1.8-ml cryovials (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 24-203P)
Cell lysis
1.Use a sterile toothpick to inoculate four sterile PCR tubes containing 100 μl ultrapure water each with a single colony expected to be an isogenic mutant. Inoculate one sterile PCR tube containing 100 μl ultrapure water with a single colony of wild-type KPPR1 as a control.
2.Streak the same colonies onto a low-salt LB-kanamycin (25 µg/ml) agar plate and incubate the plate at 30°C overnight.
3.Boil the inoculated PCR tubes for 1 min on high in a microwave.
4.Incubate the PCR tubes at −20°C until fully frozen.
5.Thaw the samples at room temperature and proceed to PCR.
PCR amplification of the target sequence
6.Design primers that anneal adjacent to the targeted DNA sequences.

Oligonucleotide primers | Sequence |
---|---|
Forward primer (aceE::tcR-check) | 5′-GCAACTAAACGCAGAACCTGTC-3′ |
Reverse primer (aceE::tcR-check) | 5′-CTTCTACTTTGTCGCCAACTTTGAC-3′ |
- a
Amplification of a ∼1.5-kb fragment indicates a successful generation of an isogenic mutant, whereas amplification of a ∼2.8-kb fragment indicates that wild-type aceE is present.
- b
Additional primer examples for checking gene deletions are detailed in Table S1 of Mike et al. (2021).
7.Prepare working stocks of primers at 10 μM.
8.Prepare five separate PCR reactions by combining 1 μl of each lysed DNA template, nuclease-free water, a PCR buffer, forward and reverse primers, dNTP mix, and DNA polymerase enzyme in a total volume of 25 μl, according to the manufacturer's directions.
9.Set up the thermal cycler program according to the specific PCR conditions required for the amplification of the targeted DNA sequence of interest.
10.Visualize the PCR products following the steps outlined in Basic Protocol 3, steps 5-8 (Fig. 2).
11.Select colonies from the low-salt LB-kanamycin (25 µg/ml) agar plate that have PCR amplified at the correct size for the isogenic mutant and save the strain following steps 24 and 25 in Basic Protocol 3.
Support Protocol 2: VERIFYING ABSENCE OF SECONDARY MUTATIONS
This protocol describes a method to analyze mutations using a web-based tool, BV-BRC. As the capsule locus is a hot spot for mutations, it is important to validate that a mutant has no secondary mutations. Briefly, a whole genome sequence of the strain of interest is submitted to BV-BRC (Olson et al., 2023). The tool will align the sequence against a reference genome selected by the user and generate a result consisting of all locus variants, including the capsule locus. This tool provides a useful and simple bioinformatic pipeline for variant calling.
Necessary Resources
- Short-read or assembled whole-genome sequence or SRR accession of SRA-deposited sequence of K. pneumoniae
- Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Centre, version 3.30.19 (BV-BRC; https://www.bv-brc.org/)
- Desktop or laptop computer (no tablets) with a minimum screen resolution 1376 × 768 and running the Chrome, Safari, or Firefox browser
Variation analysis using BV-BRC
1.Sign up and log in to BV-BRC.
2.Open ‘Variation Analysis (B)’ from the ‘TOOLS & SERVICES’ tab at the top of the homepage. A new page to submit the sequence will load (Fig. 3A).
![Details are in the caption following the image Representative screen captures of KPPR1 variation analysis using BV-BRC. (A) Whole-genome sequence to be analyzed is input in the ‘Input File’ box. SRR24994390 is used for illustration. (B) Analysis is performed against a reference sequence specified in ‘TARGET GENOME’. SRR24994390 is compared against the reference genome of ‘Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae VK055 [72407.38]’ in the example shown. (C) A list of identified variants is generated at the end of the analysis. Variations in the loci VK055_1597, VK055_2438, VK055_2811, and VK055_4590 were identified in SRR24994390.](https://static.yanyin.tech/literature_test/cpz1912-fig-0003-m.jpg)
3.Input the whole-genome sequence file by uploading the sequence file or enter an SRA Run accession number in the ‘Input File’ dialog box (Fig. 3A). For example, enter SRR24994390 to analyze variations in a KPPR1 transposon mutant submitted to the SRA database (Khadka et al., 2023). Once entered, click on the right-pointing arrow, beside the text box, to move the sequence to ‘Selected libraries’ box.
4.Select, in the parameters box, the reference strain under ‘Target Genome’ (Fig. 3B). Similarly, in the ‘Output Folder’ dropdown box, select the location where the output is to be saved after analysis. Next, enter the name of the output file. For our example, enter 72407.38 in the Target Genome textbox and select ‘ Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae strain VK055 [72407.38]’ from the list, if the parental strain is an ATCC 43816 derivative.
5.Click ‘Submit’ to start the analysis. Depending on the number of variants, server availability, and genome size, the whole analysis can take from a few minutes to several days to complete.
6.Once the analysis is complete, double-click on the job name to open the completed analysis files.
7.Locate from the list ‘all.var.html’ and open it by double-clicking. The new page will contain a list of all the variations found by BV-BRC Variation Analysis (Fig. 3C).
8.Confirm whether any non-synonymous secondary mutations are present in the list, especially in the capsule biosynthesis locus.
9.Download the analysis by clicking on the ‘DWNLD’ button on the right of the table.
Basic Protocol 4: GENERATING UNMARKED KNOCKOUT MUTANTS IN K. pneumoniae USING THE pFLP PLASMID
This protocol has been optimized from previously published methodologies and presents a comprehensive method for generating unmarked knockout mutants in K. pneumoniae using the pFLP-hyg plasmid (Chen et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2014). The pFLP-hyg plasmid harbors FLP recombinase, which facilitates the precise excision of the kanamycin selection marker flanked by FRT sites. However, for the FLP recombinase to work, the antibiotic cassette must contain the FRT sites. By employing the pFLP system, this protocol enables the removal of the antibiotic cassette introduced in Basic Protocol 3.Note that the induction of the FLP recombinase and then subsequent curing of the pFLP plasmid are done at 42°C, whereas checking for hygromycin-sensitive patches is done at 30°C. Furthermore, safety considerations are crucial throughout the procedure. It is important to maintain sterility when handling bacterial cultures and follow dedicated safety protocols for high-voltage electroporation. The protocol includes the preparation of electrocompetent cells, transformation via electroporation, induction of FLP recombinase, multi-day screening for kanamycin and hygromycin sensitivity, and confirmation of clean knockout in the mutants via colony PCR and sequencing. This approach offers an efficient and reliable method for generating unmarked knockout mutants, serving as a valuable tool for various genetic studies.
Materials
-
K. pneumoniae strain KPPR1 containing a gene replaced with an FRT-flanked antibiotic (e.g., kanamycin) cassette from Basic Protocol 3
-
Low-salt LB agar plates (see recipe) with 25 µg/ml kanamycin
-
Low-salt LB broth (see recipe)
-
0.5 mM EDTA, pH 8 (see recipe)
-
25 mg/ml kanamycin (see recipe)
-
E. coli DH5α containing pFLP-hyg (Addgene, cat. no. 87831)
-
Low-salt agar plates
-
Low-salt LB agar plates (see recipe) with 100 µg/ml hygromycin (see recipe)
-
Nuclease-free water
-
Confirmation primers designed for the affected chromosomal region
-
50% (v/v) glycerol, sterile
-
Static incubator (e.g., Fisher Scientific, Heratherm), 30°C
-
17 × 100-mm aeration culture tubes (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 21-131)
-
Shaking incubator (e.g., New Brunswick Innova 44), 30°C
-
250-ml Erlenmeyer flask (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 10-040F)
-
Static incubator (e.g., Fisher Scientific, Heratherm), 42°C
-
Static incubator (e.g., Fisher Scientific, Heratherm), 37°C
-
PCR tubes
-
Microwave
-
−20 and −80°C freezers
-
1.8-ml cryovials (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 24-203P)
Preparation of electrocompetent cells and transformation with electroporation
1.Streak K. pneumoniae strain KPPR1 containing an FRT-flanked kanamycin cassette from the −80°C glycerol stock onto a low-salt LB-kanamycin (25 µg/ml) agar plate and incubate overnight at 30°C.
2.Inoculate a single colony of K. pneumoniae strain KPPR1 containing a kanamycin cassette instead of the gene of interest into two culture tubes containing 3 ml of low-salt LB broth, 0.5 µM EDTA, and 25 µg/ml kanamycin.
3.Incubate the culture overnight at 30°C with continuous shaking (200 rpm).
4.Inoculate 1 ml of the overnight culture into a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 ml low-salt LB and 25 µg/ml kanamycin. Prepare electrocompetent cells following the steps outlined in Basic Protocol 1.
5.Perform electroporation following the steps outlined in Basic Protocol 2 (step 4 onward) using the miniprepped pFLP-hyg plasmid. Plate on low-salt LB-hygromycin (100 µg/ml) agar plates and incubate at 30°C.
Induction of FLP recombinase by heat-shocking
6.Select 12-16 colonies present on the low-salt LB-hygromycin (100 µg/ml) agar plates and streak onto a low-salt LB agar plate (without antibiotics). Incubate the plate at 42°C overnight.
Screen colonies for loss of kanamycin resistance
7.Patch the 12-16 colonies isolates from the overnight plate onto a low-salt LB agar plate and incubate at 42°C. Additionally, patch the colonies onto a low-salt LB-kanamycin (25 µg/ml) agar plate and incubate at 30°C overnight.

Passage colonies to lose the pFLP-hyg plasmid
8.Patch the colony replicates that are kanamycin sensitive onto a low-salt LB agar plate. Incubate the plate at 42°C overnight and repeatedly pass the colonies on low-salt LB agar plates for 3 consecutive days.
9.On the fourth day, patch the colony replicates onto a low-salt LB agar plate and a low-salt LB-hygromycin (100 µg/ml) agar plate to screen for hygromycin sensitivity. Incubate the low-salt LB agar plate at 42°C overnight and the low-salt LB-hygromycin agar plate at 30°C.
10.Check the low-salt LB-hygromycin agar plate for growth. If there is no growth, the pFLP-hyg plasmid has been lost; proceed to step 12.If there is growth, the pFLP-hyg plasmid remains; repeat step 11 until the strain becomes hygromycin sensitive.
11.Patch the colony replicates daily onto a low-salt LB agar plate and a low-salt LB-hygromycin agar plate (100 µg/ml) to monitor for hygromycin sensitivity until the plasmid is lost (Fig. 4).
12.Select four hygromycin- and kanamycin-sensitive colonies, inoculate four culture tubes with 3 ml each of low-salt LB broth, and incubate at 37°C overnight with shaking (200 rpm).
13.Perform colony PCR according to Support Protocol 1, steps 1-9, and save the strains that have lost the kanamycin cassette as described in Support Protocol 1, steps 10 and 11, but do not add kanamycin.
Basic Protocol 5: CONSTRUCTING A COMPLEMENTATION VECTOR FOR K. pneumoniae
This protocol describes the construction and validation of a complementation vector in a K. pneumoniae KPPR1 knockout strain to confirm the specific role of a targeted gene in an observed phenotype. Safety hazards include the need for sterile techniques during bacterial culture handling, electroporation, restriction enzyme work, and gel electrophoresis. The protocol involves preparing PCR products, constructing the complementation vector, transforming into E. coli , confirming the plasmid, and transforming into K. pneumoniae deletion strains. Successfully executing the protocol will yield a complementation vector containing the gene of interest transformed into an isogenic mutant of interest, enabling studies to determine whether the plasmid restores the phenotype of interest.
Materials
-
K. pneumoniae genomic DNA
-
Purified pACYC184 plasmid (ATCC, cat. no. 38033)
-
Primers for pACYC184 backbone and gene of interest with promoter Monarch
-
DNA polymerase and buffer
-
Nuclease-free water, prewarmed to 50°C
-
DNA gel extraction kit (New England Biolabs, cat. no. T1020L)
-
NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly master mix (New England Biolabs, cat. no. E2621X)
-
10% (v/v) glycerol, sterile
-
Electrocompetent TOP10 E. coli cells
-
Low-salt LB agar plates (see recipe)
-
Low-salt LB agar plates (see recipe) with 20 µg/ml chloramphenicol (see recipe)
-
GenCatch plasmid DNA mini-prep kit (Epoch Life Science, cat. no. 2160250)
-
10 mM dNTPs (Promega, cat. no. U1511)
-
rCutSmart Buffer (New England Biolabs, cat. no. B6004S)
-
Restriction enzyme(s)
-
Electrocompetent KPPR1 cells with the mutant gene of interest
-
1.7-ml microcentrifuge tubes, sterile (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 24-282C)
-
PCR tubes, sterile
-
Thermal cycler (e.g., Applied Biosystems Pro-flex 3 × 32-well PCR System)
-
Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit
-
Nanodrop spectrophotometer
-
25-mm-diameter mixed cellulose esters (MCE) membrane (Millipore Sigma, cat. No. VSWP02500)
-
100 × 15-mm petri dishes (USA Scientific, cat. no. 8609-0010)
-
0.1-cm electroporation cuvette (USA Scientific, cat. no. 9104-1050)
-
Xcell Gene pulser (Bio-Rad, cat. no. 1652662)
-
17 × 100-mm culture tubes (Genesee Scientific, cat. no. 21-131)
PCR amplification
1.Design primers to amplify the pACYC184 backbone and the gene of interest along with its promoter region. Primer examples for the csrD gene can be found in Table 3 (Mike et al., 2021).
Oligonucleotide primers | Sequence |
---|---|
Forward primer A (amplifies predicted csrD promoter and gene) | 5′-CATAAGGGAGAGCGTCGACCTGGTGTCCTCCGTCATGC-3′ |
Reverse primer B (amplifies predicted csrD promoter and gene) | 5′-TCCATTCAGGTCGAGGTGGCTCAAACCGAGTATCTTTGCG-3′ |
Forward primer C (amplifies pACYC184 backbone, eliminating tet) | 5′-GCCACCTCGACCTGAATGG-3′ |
Reverse primer D (amplifies pACYC184 backbone, eliminating tet) | 5′-GGTCGACGCTCTCCCTTATG-3′ |
- a
Additional primer examples for constructing complementation vectors are detailed in Table S1 in Mike et al. (2021).
2.Prepare two separate 50-μl PCR reactions for amplifying the vector backbone and two separate 50-μl PCR reactions for amplifying the gene of interest. In each reaction, mix 4 μl of each respective template (10 ng/μl), nuclease-free water, PCR buffer, forward and reverse primers, dNTP mix, and DNA polymerase enzyme.
3.Set up the thermal cycler program according to the specific PCR conditions for amplifying the vector backbone and the gene of interest. Ensure that the annealing temperature, extension time, and number of cycles are appropriate for each reaction.
4.Pool together the two 50-μl PCR reactions, and then visualize the PCR products and verify their sizes following the steps outlined in Basic Protocol 3, steps 5-8.
5.Extract the DNA bands of interest from the agarose gel using the Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit, and at the last step in the kit, elute with 12 μl prewarmed nuclease-free water.
6.Measure the concentrations of DNA for both extracted samples using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer or a Qubit system.
Ligation and transformation of the vector and insert
7.Prepare NEBuilder reactions in a sterile PCR tube. Use the NEBiocalculator to determine the 1:2 molar ratios of vector to insert(s). Add 50-100 ng of pACYC184 and the appropriate quantity of inserts to achieve a 1:2 molar ratio of vector to insert. Add 5 μl of 2× NEBuilder Master Mix and bring the final volume to 10 μl with nuclease-free water.
8.Incubate the reaction at 50°C for 60 min using a thermal cycler.
9.Dialyze the NEBuilder reaction using a 0.025-µm MCE filter disk against 10% glycerol (sterile). Perform the dialysis for 2 hr to overnight in a sterile petri dish at room temperature.
10.Recover the dialyzed DNA by adding 4 μl of 10% sterile glycerol to the surface of the dialysis discs. Carefully pipet up and down to ensure DNA recovery.
11.Combine ∼5 μl of dialyzed DNA with 50 μl of electrocompetent TOP10 E. coli cells. Appropriate controls include 5 μl of glycerol only as a negative control and 1 μl of 1:10 miniprepped pACYC184 (empty vector) as a positive control.
12.Incubate the cells on ice for 10 min, and then perform electroporation using 0.1-cm-gap cuvettes with settings of 1.8 kV, 400 Ω, and 25 μF.
13.Recover the transformed cells by adding 500 μl of low-salt LB medium and then shaking at 30°C for 2-3 hr. Plate 20 μl and 200 μl of the controls, as well as pACYC184 with gene of interest, on separate low-salt LB-chloramphenicol (20 µg/ml) agar plates. Incubate at 30°C overnight.
14.Select four single colonies and patch them onto a low-salt LB-chloramphenicol (20 µg/ml) agar plate. Use the same four colonies to inoculate four culture tubes containing 3 ml of low-salt LB broth and chloramphenicol (20 µg/ml).
15.Perform a miniprep on the pACYC184 complementation vector as described above. Elute in 35 μl of nuclease-free water and store the DNA at −20°C.
Restriction digestion and validation of a complementation vector
16.Prepare a restriction digest by combining 5 μl of the miniprepped plasmid, 1 μl of 10× rCutSmart Buffer, 0.5 μl of the appropriate restriction enzyme(s), and enough nuclease-free water to adjust the volume to 10 μl.
17.Incubate the reaction mixture at the optimal temperature and time recommended for the specific restriction enzyme(s) being used.
18.Visualize the restriction-digested plasmid by following the steps outlined in Basic Protocol 3, steps 5-8.If the digested plasmid is cut as expected, send off the plasmid for sequencing.
19.Perform the transformation of the pACYC184 complementation vector into electrocompetent KPPR1 cells with the corresponding mutant gene, following the steps outlined in Basic Protocol 2, steps 4-14.Store strains at −80°C as described in Basic Support Protocol 3, steps 24 and 25.
20.Validate the complementation vector with appropriate phenotypic assay(s) to assess effects of the gene of interest on the phenotype(s) of interest.
REAGENTS AND SOLUTIONS
L-Arabinose, 50 mM
Dissolve 0.75 g L-arabinose in 75 ml ultrapure water. Adjust the volume to 100 ml and filter sterilize with a 0.2-µm filter. Store up to 1 year at 4°C.
Chloramphenicol, 20 mg/ml and 80 mg/ml
Dissolve 0.2 g chloramphenicol to make 20 mg/ml stock for use with E. coli , or 0.8 g chloramphenicol to make 80 mg/ml stock for use with K. pneumoniae , in 10 ml of 100% ethanol and freeze aliquots. Stocks may be kept up to 1 year at −20°C.
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), pH 8, 0.50 mM
Add 0.146 g EDTA to 750 ml ultrapure water with stirring. Adjust the pH to 8 with 10 M NaOH. Once dissolved, bring volume up to 1000 ml, and autoclave. Store up to 1 year at room temperature.
HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.50 mM
Dissolve 0.238 g of HEPES into 750 ml ultrapure water with stirring. Adjust the pH to 8 with 10 M NaOH; once dissolved, bring volume up to 1000 ml and autoclave. Store up to 1 year at 4°C.
Hygromycin, 100 mg/ml
Dissolve 1 g hygromycin in 10 ml ultrapure water. Filter sterilize with a 0.2 - μm filter, aliquot, and freeze. Stock may be kept up to 1 year at −20°C.
Kanamycin, 25 mg/ml
Dissolve 0.25 g kanamycin in 10 ml ultrapure water. Filter sterilize with a 0.2-μm filter, aliquot, and freeze. Stock may be kept up to 1 year at −20°C.
Low-salt LB agar
- 5 g yeast extract
- 10 g tryptone
- 0.5 g sodium chloride
- 20 g agar
Add all reagents and then ultrapure water to a final volume of 1000 ml in a 20-L flask. Stir on a hot plate until the solids have completely dissolved and then autoclave for 20 min. Allow to cool until the medium is still liquid, but cool enough to be comfortably held (∼55°C-65°C). Add antibiotics, if needed (e.g., chloramphenicol, hygromycin, kanamycin, or spectinomycin; see recipes), once the medium has cooled and mix well. Pour ∼25-ml portions into sterile petri dishes and allow to solidify. Leave plates sit for 1-2 days at room temperature until sufficiently dry. Store in a sealed bag up to 3 months at 4°C.
Low-salt LB broth
- 5 g yeast extract
- 10 g tryptone
- 0.5 g sodium chloride
Add all reagents and ultrapure water to a final volume of 1000 ml in a 4-L beaker. Stir until the solids have completely dissolved. Distribute into a clean bottle and autoclave for 20 min. Store at room temperature for up to 3 months.
Spectinomycin, 50 mg/ml
Dissolve 0.5 g spectinomycin in 10 ml ultrapure. Filter sterilize using 0.2-μm filters and freeze aliquots. Stock may be kept up to 1 year at −20°C.
Sodium acetate, pH 5.2, 3 M
Dissolve 24.6 g of sodium acetate with 70 ml ultrapure water with stirring. Adjust the pH to 5.2 with glacial acetic acid; once dissolved, bring the volume to 100 ml. Filter the solution using a 0.2-µm filter membrane. Store up to 3 years at room temperature.
Tris/acetate/EDTA (TAE) buffer, 1×
- 242 g Tris base
- 57.1 ml glacial acetic acid
- 100 ml 0.5 M EDTA solution, pH 8.0
- Adjust volume to 1 L for 50× TAE
- Dilute 20 ml of 50× stock into 980 ml ultrapure water to make 1× TAE
- Store up to 1.5 years at room temperature
COMMENTARY
Background Information
The emergence of hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKp) strains has become a significant global concern in recent years. These strains can cause severe community-acquired infections in otherwise healthy people and display enhanced virulence factors compared to classical K. pneumoniae strains (Choby et al., 2020). Despite the prevalence of these strains over the past three decades, the precise molecular mechanisms required for hvKp pathogenesis remain underexplored (Lan et al., 2021). Over the years, the genetic manipulation of K. pneumoniae has posed several challenges, including the presence of the thick exopolysaccharide capsule that is associated with hvKp strains and limits transformation efficiency. Furthermore, the high antibiotic-resistance profiles of clinical isolates from hospital-associated infections can make selecting antibiotic markers a challenge.
Preparation of electrocompetent cells for electroporation
One of the techniques used for genetic manipulation in K. pneumoniae is the preparation of electrocompetent cells for electroporation (Bachman et al., 2015). Unlike E. coli , K. pneumoniae is not yet amenable to chemical transformation. Electroporation therefore serves as a useful alternative method for transforming K. pneumoniae. However, the bacterium's thick polysaccharide capsule makes preparing competent cells challenging. Therefore, it is important to note that electroporation requires specialized equipment and expertise, which can be a potential disadvantage in terms of accessibility and practicality in certain laboratory settings.
Isogenic mutagenesis using recombineering
Another technique, targeted mutagenesis using the λ Red recombination system, can be employed in K. pneumoniae (Bachman et al., 2015). The pKD46-spr plasmid carries the necessary genes (γ, β, and exo) comprising the λ Red recombinase enzymes (Datsenko & Wanner, 2000). These enzymes enable efficient homologous recombination, allowing researchers to quickly introduce specific genetic modifications, deletions, or insertions into the K. pneumoniae genome. The advantage of the pKD46-spr recombinase system is its ability to quickly generate mutants. However, a potential drawback is the possibility of off-target effects with λ Red recombinase, which is why complementation and validation of a mutant are necessary. As the cost of whole-genome sequencing continues to drop, it will likely become common practice to perform whole-genome sequencing to ensure that no off-target mutations are introduced by λ Red recombinase.
Validation of a mutant and verification of the absence of off-target effects
To validate a mutant and verify the absence of off-target effects, a combination of colony PCR and whole-genome sequencing to identify any secondary mutations can be employed. Colony PCR is used for rapid screening of individual bacterial colonies to confirm the presence or absence of the desired genetic modification. Although it offers high throughput and is quick, it cannot detect potential off-target effects. DNA sequencing, on the other hand, provides accurate nucleotide-level information and can identify specific genetic modifications, but it is more time- consuming and costly. Therefore, a combination of these techniques can be employed whereby colony PCR is used for initial validation and then sequencing is performed to verify the absence of off-target mutations. This approach ensures a comprehensive assessment of the mutants while balancing efficiency and accuracy.
Generating clean knockouts using the FLP recombinase
To generate clean knockouts, the FLP recombinase system is utilized. This approach involves the use of the pFLP-hyg plasmid containing the FLP recombinase (Chen et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2014). The pFLP-hyg plasmid enables the excision of the kanamycin selection marker from the chromosome via flippase recognition target (FRT) sites. This specific excision ensures that any observed changes or phenotypic alterations can be solely attributed to the loss of the targeted gene, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of experimental results. The advantage of using pFLP-hyg for generating clean knockouts lies in its ability to perform highly targeted and specific excision events through site-specific recombination at FRT sites, effectively minimizing the risk of unintended mutations or genetic rearrangements. However, one potential drawback of this system is the additional time required to remove the plasmid from the bacterial population. Alternatively, the allelic exchange system can be used to generate clean knockouts, but this may require additional time and expertise.
Complementation vector for phenotypic restoration
Complementation experiments are crucial for studying the relationship between gene mutations and phenotypic changes. Complementation makes it possible to understand the impact of gene mutations or deletions on a phenotype of interest. By introducing a functional copy of the mutated or deleted gene, complementation restores normal gene function and allows assessment of its associated phenotype. These experiments establish a causal relationship between the gene of interest and observed phenotype. One potential disadvantage of complementation is the possibility of overexpression or misexpression of the gene of interest.
Critical Parameters and Troubleshooting
Bacterial transformation via electroporation
When preparing competent cells for transformation, there are several potential errors to be aware of that can impact the efficiency of the transformation. Monitoring bacterial growth during the mid-log phase is crucial, as exceeding this phase can result in reduced transformation efficiency. Maintaining the competent cells on ice throughout the process is essential to ensure high efficiency. Adequate washing of the cells is important to remove potential salts that could cause arcing during transformation. If the transformation efficiency is poor, it could be due to low-quality DNA. Furthermore, if both the positive control and the experimental control show no growth, this indicates a problem with the viability of the cells. If growth is observed on the negative control, that indicates contamination of the reagents.
Isogenic mutagenesis using pKD46-spr
When generating isogenic mutants in K. pneumoniae using the λ Red recombinase system, there are potential pitfalls to consider. If PCR product amplification fails, check primer design for errors, ensure DNA template and primers are of good quality, and optimize PCR conditions. The addition of 3% DMSO can help reduce nonspecific amplification. If no colonies grow on selection plates after transformation, confirm antibiotic concentration and plate quality, try increasing DNA concentration, check for contamination during plating, and remember to add L-arabinose during electrocompetent preparation for successful gene excision with the pKD46-spr plasmid.
Generating a clean knockout using the pFLP-hyg plasmid
When generating clean-knockout mutants in K. pneumoniae using the pFLP-hyg plasmid, there are several potential pitfalls to consider. Insufficient passaging of the colonies can lead to incomplete loss of the pFLP-hyg plasmid. To address this, it is crucial to continuously streak the colonies on low-salt LB at 42°C to promote plasmid loss. If growth is observed on the low-salt LB-hygromycin plate, further streaking and incubation on antibiotic-free LB agar plates is necessary to ensure complete removal of the plasmid. Additionally, accurate selection of colonies that are sensitive to both hygromycin and kanamycin is important. During DNA extraction, proper boiling of PCR tubes and correct thawing of samples are essential for obtaining high-quality DNA templates for sequencing.
Constructing a complementation vector
If amplification of the pACYC184 backbone and gene of interest is not successful, troubleshooting the PCR conditions and primer design may be necessary. Inadequate transformation or ligation can be addressed by optimizing the reaction conditions and adjusting the DNA concentrations. If the complementation vector is not validated through restriction digestion or sequencing, repeating the procedure or considering alternative vector designs can remedy molecular biology challenges.
Understanding Results
Electrocompetent cells
The anticipated result from following the protocol for preparing electrocompetent cells is the production of a suspension of electrocompetent cells highly capable of taking up foreign DNA through electroporation. These cells can be stored at −80°C and used for various molecular biology applications, such as introducing plasmids, gene knockouts, or other genetic modifications into the K. pneumoniae strain.
Transformation via electroporation
After completing the protocol for transforming K. pneumoniae using electroporation, one anticipated result is growth of colonies on low-salt LB-antibiotic selection plates. These colonies represent the successful transformation of K. pneumoniae cells with the desired plasmid DNA. Additionally, growth on a positive control plate indicates the competent cells are efficient. If there is no growth on a positive control plate, this indicates the competent cells are no longer viable or electroporation did not work. If there is growth on a negative control plate, this indicates potential contamination of reagents or the antibiotic in the plate is inadequate. The visualization of colonies serves as a tangible indication of the transformation success and provides researchers with the basis for further genetic studies and applications involving the genetically modified K. pneumoniae strains.
Creation of an isogenic mutant
Upon completing this protocol, the anticipated results include the successful generation of isogenic mutants in K. pneumoniae with an antibiotic-resistance cassette. The first expected result is visualizing the kanamycin cassette during PCR amplification using gel electrophoresis. Our lab typically observes 75% to 100% correct insertion of the antibiotic cassette in surviving colonies. Subsequently, the presence of colonies on the low-salt LB-kanamycin plates confirm the successful transformation and integration of the kanamycin cassette into the target gene site. The mutants can be stored in cryovials at −80°C for long-term preservation and future use.
Colony PCR
After a colony PCR screen is conducted, the anticipated results involve detecting the presence or absence of the desired genetic modification through gel electrophoresis. The modification can be identified by comparing the size (in base pairs) of the PCR product with that of the wild-type strain lacking the modification. Restriction digest can further confirm insertion of an antibiotic cassette. This visual comparison allows researchers to determine if the desired genetic modification has been successfully introduced into the target organism.
Validating absence of secondary mutations
Upon completion of this protocol, the anticipated result is a compilation of all locus variants, including the capsule locus. This will identify any undesired secondary mutations within the strain, ensuring a clean genetic modification.
Removal of antibiotic selection marker
After generation of a clean-knockout mutant utilizing the pFLP-Hyg plasmid, the anticipated result would be a gene-deletion strain with no antibiotic cassette. As passaging continues, the beginning of loss of the pFLP-Hyg plasmid can be seen as intermediate sensitivity that makes the colonies appear blotchy on LB-hygromycin agar plates. Upon successfully completing this protocol, the anticipated visual result would be no growth on the low-salt LB-hygromycin (100 µg/ml), no growth on the low-salt LB-kanamycin (25 µg/ml), and growth on the low-salt LB plate.
Complementation vector
After the construction of a complementation vector is completed, the anticipated result would be the restoration of a mutant phenotype, thereby confirming the significance of the gene or genetic element of interest. After PCR amplification of the vector backbone, promoter, and the gene of interest, the anticipated result would be identification of the correct sizes (in base pairs) of PCR products by gel electrophoresis. Upon completion of the ligation and transformation, the anticipated result would be visualization of colonies on a low-salt LB-antibiotic selection plate indicating that the plasmid ligation and transformation was successful. Additional anticipated results would be correct band sizes after a restriction enzyme digestion, sequencing results with no mutations, and restoration to wild-type levels of a mutant strain carrying the complementation vector.
Time Considerations
Preparing electrocompetent K. pneumoniae cells (Basic Protocol 1)
Two overnight incubations are required to have a culture ready for generating electrocompetent cells. The actual electrocompetent cell preparation may take up to 6 hr depending on how long the bacterial culture takes to reach mid-log phase.
Preparing electrocompetent pKD46-spr K. pneumoniae cells (Alternate Protocol 1)
The actual electrocompetent cell preparation may take up to 6-7 hr depending on the time it takes the pKD46-spr to reach mid-log phase when growing at 30°C.
Transforming K. pneumoniae utilizing electroporation (Basic Protocol 2)
The estimated total time for this protocol is ∼24 hr from start to finish. This duration accounts for the overnight incubation of the plates to allow the colonies to grow and be visible; the transformation using electroporation will take 3-5 hr. This timeframe includes preparing the plasmid DNA and cells, electroporating, recovering, and plating the bacteria. Keep in mind that the actual time may vary depending on the researcher's efficiency and familiarity with the protocol.
Constructing isogenic mutants in K. pneumoniae using the λ red recombinase system (Basic Protocol 3)
Much of the time required for this protocol is for the preparation of electrocompetent cells and PCR product. The estimated total time to complete the entire protocol is 2 days.
Confirming a knockout via colony PCR (Support Protocol 1)
Much of the time required for this protocol is the overnight culture. The estimated time taken to complete the entire colony PCR portion is ∼6 hr.
Verifying absence of secondary capsule locus variants (Support Protocol 2)
Uploading the whole genome sequence file to BV-BRC can take several minutes, whereas the genome analysis may take a few minutes to several days to complete, depending on the number of variants, server availability, and genome size.
Generating clean-knockout mutants in K. pneumoniae using the pFLP-hyg plasmid (Basic Protocol 4)
Much of the time required for this protocol is for multi-day passaging, which takes ∼15 min per day to passage. The estimated time taken to complete the protocol ranges from 5 to 11 days.
Constructing a complementation vector for phenotypic restoration in K. pneumoniae
The estimated total time for this protocol is ∼4 days from start to finish.
Acknowledgments
Support for the authors and development of these methods was provided by the University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, the American Heart Association 23CDA1056712 (L.A.M.), K22 AI145849 (L.A.M.), and R35 GM150588 (L.A.M.) from the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Heart Association or the National Institutes of Health.
Author Contributions
Brooke E. Ring : Conceptualization; methodology; supervision; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Saroj Khadka : Writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Drew A. Pariseau : Writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Laura A. Mike : Conceptualization; methodology; project administration; supervision; writing—review and editing.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Literature Cited
- Bachman, M. A., Breen, P., Deornellas, V., Mu, Q., Zhao, L., Wu, W., Cavalcoli, J. D., & Mobley, H. L. T. (2015). Genome-wide identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae fitness genes during lung infection. mBio , 6(3), e00775. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00775-15
- Broberg, C. A., Wu, W., Cavalcoli, J. D., Miller, V. L., & Bachman, M. A. (2014). Complete genome sequence of Klebsiella pneumoniae strain ATCC 43816 KPPR1, a rifampin-resistant mutant commonly used in animal, genetic, and molecular biology studies. Genome Announcements , 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00889
- Chen, A. I., Albicoro, F. J., Zhu, J., & Goulian, M. (2021). Effects of regulatory network organization and environment on PmrD connector activity and polymyxin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy , 65(3), e00889-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00889-00820
- Choby, J. E., Howard-Anderson, J., & Weiss, D. S. (2020). Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae —clinical and molecular perspectives. Journal of Internal Medicine , 287(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13007
- Datsenko, K. A., & Wanner, B. L. (2000). One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 97(12), 6640–6645. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120163297
- Fournet-Fayard, S., Joly, B., & Forestier, C. (1995). Transformation of wild type Klebsiella pneumoniae with plasmid DNA by electroporation. Journal of Microbiological Methods , 24(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(95)00053-4
- Hu, Y., Anes, J., Devineau, S., & Fanning, S. (2021). Klebsiella pneumoniae : Prevalence, reservoirs, antimicrobial resistance, pathogenicity, and infection: A hitherto unrecognized zoonotic bacterium. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease , 18(2), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2020.2847
- Huang, T. W., Lam, I., Chang, H. Y., Tsai, S. F., Palsson, B. O., & Charusanti, P. (2014). Capsule deletion via a λ-Red knockout system perturbs biofilm formation and fimbriae expression in Klebsiella pneumoniae MGH 78578. BMC Research Notes , 7, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-13
- Khadka, S., Ring, B. E., Walker, R. S., Krzeminski, L. R., Pariseau, D. A., Hathaway, M., Mobley, H. L. T., & Mike, L. A. (2023). Urine-mediated suppression of Klebsiella pneumoniae mucoidy is counteracted by spontaneous Wzc variants altering capsule chain length. Msphere , 11(3), e0028823.
- Lan, P., Jiang, Y., Zhou, J., & Yu, Y. (2021). A global perspective on the convergence of hypervirulence and carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance , 25, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.02.020
- Lawlor, M. S., Hsu, J., Rick, P. D., & Miller, V. L. (2005). Identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence determinants using an intranasal infection model. Molecular Microbiology , 58(4), 1054–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04918.x
- Mike, L. A., Stark, A. J., Forsyth, V. S., Vornhagen, J., Smith, S. N., Bachman, M. A., & Mobley, H. L. T. (2021). A systematic analysis of hypermucoviscosity and capsule reveals distinct and overlapping genes that impact Klebsiella pneumoniae fitness. PLOS Pathogens , 17(3), e1009376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009376
- Olson, R. D., Assaf, R., Brettin, T., Conrad, N., Cucinell, C., Davis, J. J., Dempsey, D. M., Dickerman, A., Dietrich, E. M., Kenyon, R. W., Kuscuoglu, M., Lefkowitz, E. J., Lu, J., Machi, D., Macken, C., Mao, C., Niewiadomska, A., Nguyen, M., Olsen, G. J., … Stevens, R. L. (2023). Introducing the bacterial and viral bioinformatics resource center (BV-BRC): A resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Research , 51(D1), D678–d689. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1003
- Park, S., & Ko, K. S. (2023). Improvement of transformation efficiency in hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae using citric acid. Journal of Microbiological Methods , 205, 106673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2023.106673
- Standiford, T. J., Wilkowski, J. M., Sisson, T. H., Hattori, N., Mehrad, B., Bucknell, K. A., & Moore, T. A. (1999). Intrapulmonary tumor necrosis factor gene therapy increases bacterial clearance and survival in murine gram-negative pneumonia. Human Gene Therapy , 10(6), 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1089/10430349950018300
- Wang, G., Zhao, G., Chao, X., Xie, L., & Wang, H. (2020). The characteristic of virulence, biofilm and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 17(17), 6278.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 1
- Drew A. Pariseau, Brooke E. Ring, Saroj Khadka, Laura A. Mike, Cultivation and Genomic DNA Extraction of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Current Protocols, 10.1002/cpz1.932, 4 , 1, (2024).