Targeted optogenetic stimulations

Mai-Anh Vu, Mark Howe

Published: 2024-01-24 DOI: 10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8pxz6g2w/v1

Abstract

We have developed a new micro-fiber array approach capable of chronically measuring and optogenetically manipulating local dynamics across over 100 targeted locations simultaneously in head-fixed and freely moving mice, enabling investigation of cell-type and neurotransmitter-specific signals over arbitrary 3-D volumes . This protocol includes the steps for targeted optogenetic manipulation. Please contact us (mwhowe@bu.edu) if you are interested in using this technique.

Steps

Targeted optogenetic stimulations

1.

To couple light into individual optical fibers in our array for targeted optogenetic manipulations, simultaneously with imaging, we integrated a programmable digital mirror device (DMD, Mightex Polygon1000 Pattern Illuminator DSI-K3-L20) into the light path of our imaging microscope (see Multi-color fiber array imaging protocol) as detailed via the substeps below:

1.1.

Excitation light was provided by a 3.2W, 465nm laser (Mightex, LSR-040-0465), which was coupled to the DMD with an optical fiber.

1.2.

Light from the DMD was coupled into the objective path by a dichroic (Chroma 570lpxr).

1.3.

570nm excitation and emission filters (see Multi-color fiber array imaging protocol) enabled simultaneous imaging of red fluorophores during stimulation.

2.

Control of light patterning and stimulation parameters was achieved with PolyScan2 control software (Mightex) and custom MATLAB functions.

3.

A calibration step was performed prior to stimulations to align the camera view with the PolyScan2 software, allowing us to design patterns of circular light (~40μm diameter for each spot) to target individual fibers.

4.

Transmission efficiency through 50μm diameter fibers in our arrays was calculated at approximately 39% based on comparisons between power at the objective and transmitted light through individual fibers.

4.1.

For stimulations of dopamine release, a light spot of ~750 μW (measured at the objective) was used, resulting in an estimated power density of 175 mW/mm2 (0.29 mW total power) at each implanted fiber tip.

4.2.

For stimulations of D1 expressing neurons, a light spot of ~600 μW at the objective was used, resulting in an estimated power density of 141 mW/mm2 (0.23 mW total power) at the fiber tip.

5.

We estimated relative excitation light intensity and excitation area as a function of distance from the fiber tip by applying a light scattering model developed by Yona et. al 2016 with a scattering coefficient of 140 cm-1 approximated for the striatum based on Azimipour et al 2014 and Al-Juboori et al. 2013 and an activation threshold for ChR2 of 1 mW/mm^2 70,71.

6.

Light pulse trains for stimulation (30Hz, 4ms pulse width, 1s or 5/10s durations for DA and D1 neuron stimulation respectively) were programmed in PolyScan2 and triggered with 5V digital pulses controlled via MATLAB and sent from a NIDAQ board (National Instruments PCIe 6343) to the Polygon. Stimulations were triggered randomly (inter-stimulation interval 30-60 seconds) for 5-10 minutes per session for all stimulation experiments.

推荐阅读

Nature Protocols
Protocols IO
Current Protocols
扫码咨询