Linker Ligation at both Ends of RNAs on Beads

Clémentine Delan-Forino, David Tollervey

Published: 2021-09-03 DOI: 10.17504/protocols.io.bntgmejw

Abstract

The RNA exosome complex functions in both the accurate processing and rapid degradation of many classes of RNA in eukaryotes and Archaea. Functional and structural analyses indicate that RNA can either be threaded through the central channel of the exosome or more directly access the active sites of the ribonucleases Rrp44 and Rrp6, but in most cases, it remains unclear how many substrates follow each pathway in vivo. Here we describe the method for using an UV cross-linking technique termed CRAC to generate stringent, transcriptome-wide mapping of exosome–substrate interaction sites in vivo and at base-pair resolution.

We present a protocol for the identification of RNA interaction sites for the exosome, using UV cross-linking and analysis of c DNA (CRAC) [ 1 , 2 ]. A number of related protocols for the identification of sites of RNA–protein interaction have been reported, including HITS-CLIP, CLIP-Seq, iCLIP, eCLIP, and others [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. These all exploit protein immunoprecipitation to isolate protein–RNA complexes. CRAC is distinguished by the inclusion of tandem affinity purification and denaturing purification, allowing greater stringency in the recovery of authentic RNA–protein interaction sites.

To allow CRAC analyses, strains are created that express a “bait” protein with a tripartite tag. This generally consists of His6, followed by a TEV-protease cleavage site, then two copies of the z-domain from Protein A (HTP). The tag is inserted at the C terminus of the endogenous gene within the chromosome. The fusion construct is the only version of the protein expressed and this is under the control of the endogenous promoter. Several alternative tags have been successfully used, including a version with N-terminal fusion to a tag consisting of 3× FLAG-PreSission protease (PP) cleavage site-His6 (FPH) [ 7 ]. This is a smaller construct and is suitable for use on proteins with structures that are incompatible with C-terminal tagging. An additional variant is the insertion of a PP site into a protein that is also HTP tagged. This allows the separation of different domains of multidomain proteins. Importantly, the intact protein is cross-linked in the living cell, with domain separation in vitro. This has been successfully applied to the exosome subunit Rrp44/Dis3 to specifically identify binding sites for the PIN endonuclease domain [ 8 ].

Briefly, during standard CRAC analyses, covalently linked protein–exosome complexes are generated in vivo by irradiation with UV-C (254 nm). This generates RNA radicals that rapidly react with proteins in direct contact with the affected nucleotide (zero length cross-linking). The cells are then lysed and complexes with the bait protein are purified using an IgG column. Protein–RNA complexes are specifically eluted by TEV cleavage of the fusion protein and cross-linked RNAs trimmed using RNase A/T1, leaving a protected “footprint” of the protein binding site on the RNA. Trimmed complexes are denatured using 6 M Guanidinium, immobilized on Ni-NTA affinity resin and washed under denaturing conditions to dissociate copurifying proteins and complexes. The subsequent enzymatic steps are all performed on-column, during which RNA 3′ and 5′ ends are prepared, labeled with 32P (to allow RNA–protein complexes to be followed during gel separation) and linkers ligated. Note, however, that alternatives to using 32P labeling have been reported (e.g., [ 6 ]). The linker-ligated, RNA–protein complexes are eluted from the Ni-NTA resin and size selected on a denaturing SDS-PAGE gel. Following elution, the bound RNA is released by degradation of the bait protein using treatment with Proteinase K. The recovered RNA fragments are identified by reverse transcription, PCR amplification and sequencing using an Illumina platform.

Relative to CLIP-related protocols, CRAC offers the advantages of stringent purification, that substantially reduces background, and on-bead linker ligation that simplifies separation of reaction constituents during successive enzymatic steps. It also avoids the necessity to generate high-affinity antibodies needed for immunoprecipitation. Potential disadvantages are that, despite their ubiquitous use in yeast studies, tagged constructs may not be fully functional. This can be partially mitigated by confirming the ability of the tagged protein to support normal cell growth and/or RNA processing, or by comparing the behavior of N- and C-terminal tagged constructs. Additionally, because linkers are ligated to the protein–RNA complex, a possible disadvantage is that UV-cross-linking of the RNA at, or near, the 5′ or 3′ end it may sterically hinder on-column (de)phosphorylation and/or linker ligation. With these caveats, CRAC has been successfully applied to >50 proteins in budding yeast, and in other systems ranging from pathogenic bacteria to viral infected mouse cells [ 7 , 9 ].

Before start

Appropriate negative controls and experimental replicates are required to determine the background signal and true positive binding sites. We routinely use the (untagged) yeast parental strain as a negative control, performing a minimum of two biological and technical replicates for each sample. It is commonly observed that technical replicates (even samples from the same culture) processed in two independent CRAC experiments show more differences than two biological replicates (independent cultures) processed together.

All steps should be performed wearing disposable gloves and materials should be free of DNase and RNase. Prior to each CRAC experiment, pipettes should be cleaned with DNAZap (ThermoFisher; AM9890) to avoid DNA contamination at the PCR step, followed by RNaseZAP (ThermoFisher; AM9890) treatment, and rinsed with deionized water. All the buffers should be prepared with deionized water and free of RNases; however, DEPC treatment is not normally essential. To minimize buffer contamination, adjust the pH by taking small aliquots for measurements. Filter-sterilize stock solutions following preparation, and store at 4 °C. Where required, add β-mercaptoethanol and protease inhibitors to the buffers shortly before use. Wash buffers should be prepared immediately before starting the CRAC experiment.

Steps

Dephosphorylation of RNA 3′ P Ends Using Alkaline Phosphatase (TSAP)

1.

Note
TSAP catalyzes removal of 5′ and 3′ phosphate groups from DNA and RNA; it is effective on 3′ overhangs, 5′ overhangs and blunt ends and leaves 5′ OH and 3′ OH ends. Treating the RNAs with alkaline phosphatase will remove the 3′ phosphates left behind by the RNase cleavage of the RNA.

2.

Spin out the residual 1× PNK buffer and close the column with the supplied press-on bottom stopper.

3.

To each sample, add 80µL that contains:

  • 16µL
  • 8µL
  • 2µL
  • 54µL
4.

Mix by stirring with a pipette tip then flicking column gently.

5.

Incubate at 37°C for 0h 30m 0s.

6.

Wash the resin once with 400µL and three times with 400µL.

On Bead Ligation of 3′ miRCat-33 Linker

7.

Note
The 3′-linker is a DNA oligonucleotide that has a blocked 3′ end to prevent self-ligation and a 5′-end that is preactivated by adenylation (AppN…). T4 RNA ligase usually activates its substrate by preadenylation using ATP. Employing a preadenylated linker allows the reactions to be performed in the absence of ATP. This decreases the risk of circularizing any remaining 5′-phosphorylated RNA; a side reaction that would otherwise be expected. Moreover, addition of ATP in the mix could inhibit the reaction, as the active site of T4 RNA ligase would get adenylated and could not transfer the adenosine to any substrate as the linker is already adenylated.

8.

Spin out the residual volume of 1× PNK buffer. Close the bottom of the column with the press-on stopper.

9.

To each sample, add 76µL containing:

  • 16µL
  • 8µL
  • 2µL
  • 50µL
10.

To each sample add 4µL.

11.

Incubate at 25°C for 4h 0m 0s.

12.

Wash the resin once with 400µL and three times with 400µL.

Phosphorylating the 5′ Ends of Cross-Linked RNA

13.

Note
The labeling reaction is performed first with radioactive ATP only to obtain a reasonable radioactive signal from the RNA in the sample. Subsequently, nonlabeled ATP is added to the reaction to allow efficient phosphorylation of all RNA 5′ ends in the sample, required for 5′ end adapter ligation.

14.

Spin out the residual volume of 1× PNK buffer. Cap the bottom of the column.

15.

To the resin, add 80µL containing:

  • 16µL
  • 4µL
  • 56µL
  • 4µL
16.

Incubate at 37°C for 0h 40m 0s.

17.

Add 1µL and continue the incubation for 0h 20m 0s.

18.

Wash the resin four times with 400µL and three times with 400µL.

Note
Additional washes can be done to remove most free radioactive ATP and decrease the chance of radioactive contamination at later stages. Perform the washes until the radioactivity of the flow through measured with a manual Geiger counter falls to approximately 10–15 cps.

On-Column Ligation of the 5′ Adapters

19.

Note
These linkers have blocked 5′ end to prevent self-concatenation. Moreover, they contain barcodes allowing distinction of samples in case of multiplexing and random nucleotides to distinguish molecules with same 5′- and 3′-end (allowing removal of PCR duplicates). It is crucial to use different barcodes for each sample.

20.

Spin out the residual volume of 1× PNK buffer.

21.

Add 75µL containing:

  • 16µL
  • 8µL
  • 2µL
  • 49µL
22.

To each sample add 1µL and 4µL.

23.

Incubate at 16°C.

24.

Wash the resin three times with Wash Buffer II.

推荐阅读

Nature Protocols
Protocols IO
Current Protocols
扫码咨询