Research on ERIH PLUS approved SSH journals present in OpenCitations Meta database
Ali Ghasempouri, maddalena.ghiotto, sebastiano.giacomini
Disclaimer
DISCLAIMER – FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; USE AT YOUR OWN RISK
The protocol content here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical, clinical, or safety advice, or otherwise; content added to protocols.io is not peer reviewed and may not have undergone a formal approval of any kind. Information presented in this protocol should not substitute for independent professional judgment, advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Any action you take or refrain from taking using or relying upon the information presented here is strictly at your own risk. You agree that neither the Company nor any of the authors, contributors, administrators, or anyone else associated with protocols.io, can be held responsible for your use of the information contained in or linked to this protocol or any of our Sites/Apps and Services.
Abstract
In this study, we present a comprehensive workflow to assess the coverage of publications in Social Science and Humanities (SSH) journals indexed in ERIH-PLUS and their Open Access status according to the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The workflow utilizes three data sources: ERIH-PLUS, OpenCitations Meta, and DOAJ.
The application of this workflow results in a dataset containing detailed information on SSH publications, including their disciplines, countries of origin, and Open Access status. Each step of the methodology enriches the dataset with new variables and insights. The output of this workflow includes discipline and country rankings, as well as visualizations to effectively communicate the findings. By following this step-by-step approach, researchers can better understand the landscape of SSH publications, identify trends in disciplines and countries, and evaluate the prevalence of Open Access in the field.
The software implemented by means of this methodology and related documentation can be found in our github repository that will eventually be published on Zenodo.
Steps
Retrieve OpenCitation Meta publication and Journals that are registered in ERIH-PLUS index
Starting from the ERIH-PLUS index of Social Science and Humanities approved journals dataset
ERIHPLUSapprovedJournals.csv (downloaded 27/04/2023) we want to retrieve all the publications belonging to one of those journals, included in OpenCitations Meta database (https://opencitations.net/meta#:~:text=For%20each%20publication%2C%20the%20metadata,and%20PubMed%20Identifiers%20(PMIDs).)
Create our final Datasets
By merging mergeing the disciplines dataset and the countries dataset with merged_data , by means of the unique OMID, we add to the dataset the publication count for each venue.
The output datasets will look like this:
A | B | C |
---|---|---|
Cultural Studies | ... | 12 |
Art and Art History | identifier | 12 |
Art and Art History | identifier | 65 |
Cultural Studies | identifier | |
Human Geography and Urban Studies | ||
Human Geography and Urban Studies |
Disciplines_df
A | B | C |
---|---|---|
Spain | identifier | 12 |
Italy | identifier | 65 |
Countries_df
In order to fulfill this task, we download the OpenCitations Meta data dump.
To process the files we run the function process_files() : this script processes CSV files in parallel.
This is how it works:
with concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=4) as executor:
```This line creates a ProcessPoolExecutor with 4 worker processes. The with statement is used to ensure that the executor is properly closed once the processing is done. The number 4 represents the maximum number of worker processes that will be created to execute the tasks concurrently. You can adjust this number based on the resources available on your system.
results = executor.map(process_file_wrapper, [(f, erih_plus_df) for f in batch_files])
The executor.map() function is used to apply the process_file_wrapper function to a list of input arguments. In this case, the input arguments are tuples, each containing a file from the batch_files and the erih_plus_df DataFrame. The executor.map() function returns an iterator that yields the results of applying the process_file_wrapper function to each tuple in the list.
all_results.extend(results)
Processing the ERIH-PLUS Journals dataset and matching venues identifiers with OpenCitations Meta dump's venues.
For this step, the function process_meta_csv () is called. It takes in input as parameters
-
the chunk of the csv that is being processed
-
and the ERIH-PLUS dataset as a dataframe.
Processing whether each journal in the merged_data dataframe is Open Access based on its ISSN being present in the DOAJ data.
For this step, the ancillary function process_doaj_file() is called.
This function takes in input
-
doaj_df
-
merged_data
and returns a Dataframe structured as follows:
A | B | C | D | E |
---|---|---|---|---|
meta:br/060167 | [2423-5251, 8763-2891] | 876390 | 12 | Unknown |
meta:br/060167 | [4522-4592, 5687-3452] | 503890 | 56 | True |
The function follows these steps:
It first selects three columns from the DOAJ dataframe: the 5th, 6th, and 10th columns. The columns correspond to print ISSN, online ISSN, and Country of publisher (about the latter: see step 2.3 below).
It then creates an empty dictionary, open_access_dict , which will map both print and online ISSNs to a Boolean value True that indicates Open Access status.
The function loops over the rows of the DOAJ dataframe, adding each print and online ISSN to the dictionary and setting its value to True.
It creates a list, open_access_keys , of all the keys (ISSNs) in the open_access_dict .
It then adds a new column, 'Open Access' , to the merged_data dataframe and initializes all its values to 'Unknown' .
The function goes over each ISSN in the merged_data dataframe. If this ISSN is found in the open_access_keys , the Open Access status of that row in merged_data is updated to True.
Retrieving Data about Countries and Disciplines
Our second and third research question are
-
What are the disciplines that have more publications?
-
What are countries providing the largest number of publications and journals?
These information are both present in the ERIH-PLUS dataset. The script ' Disciplines_Countries_classes.py' allows for processing metadata from multiple sources to retrieve and count information about journals by country and discipline. The code is object-oriented, utilizing classes and inheritance for shared attributes and methods. The ' class ResultsProcessor' is a base class. It takes two parameters: ‘ meta_coverage ’ and ‘ meta_coverage_processed_files ’. It reads the processed files into a dataframe and gets dataframes for ERIH PLUS and DOAJ data.
Disciplines :
The script processes discipline information by creating a dictionary. Each discipline is mapped to a list of journal IDs associated with that discipline. This allows us to count the disciplines and understand which one has the highest number of publications.
Countries:
This class is used to process country information. It selects certain columns from the DOAJ dataframe. It creates a dictionary mapping each country to a list of journal IDs that are published in that country. The method uses a helper function to retrieve country information for unmatched journals from the DOAJ dataset.
Missing Countries:
- The script checks whether there are missing countries in the ERIH-PLUS dataset that are present in the DOAJ dataset. It does this by creating a dataframe that only includes rows where the journal ID is in the list of unmatched ISSNs. It then tries to match the ISSNs in both versions of the dataset.
- It cleans up the resulting dataframe by selecting only necessary columns, merging the country information into a new 'Country' column, and dropping duplicates. It then separates the entries where 'Country' is still NaN after the merge. The country dictionary is updated by adding the journal ID of each journal to the list corresponding to its 'Country' in the dictionary.
- It checks for and handles some specific cases where the country names may appear differently but refer to the same country (e.g., 'Turkey' and 'Türkiye', 'Venezuela' and 'Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of', 'Republic of').
Final counts
To answer our research questions, we will compute the counts of publications and journals for both disciplines and countries. It will take in input either the country or the discipline dictionary created in the previous step ( 2.1, 2.3 ) and the label to set as the first column value in the final dataset .
The method iterates over the dictionary keys to filter the first output DataFrame ( SSH_Publications_in_OC_Meta_and_Open_Access_status.csv ) according to journals in the list specified as value, then it stores the length of the filtered DataFrame as the count of the journals . Lastly, it sums all the values in the column Publications_in_venue to calculate the count of publications.
About our research question "How many of the SSH journals are available in Open Access according to the data in DOAJ?": we will simply count the rows that have a " TRUE " value in the Open Access column of SSH_Publications_in_OC_Meta_and_Open_Access_status.csv
Visualize results
For each visualization, we use Python libraries like Matplotlib, Seaborn, Plotly to create the bar and pie charts and map, as follow:
-
a bar plot that visualizes the number of publications for different disciplines. Each discipline is represented by a bar, and the height of the bar corresponds to the publication count. The plot also includes axis labels, a title, and gridlines on the x-axis. The colors used for the bars are defined in the colors list.
-
a horizontal bar chart that shows the top 30 countries ranked by their journal count. Each country is represented by a bar, and the length of the bar corresponds to the journal count.
-
a horizontal bar chart that shows the last 30 countries ranked by their journal count. Each country is represented by a bar, and the length of the bar corresponds to the journal count.
-
a horizontal bar chart that shows the top 30 countries ranked by their publication count. Each country is represented by a bar, and the length of the bar corresponds to the publication count.
-
a horizontal bar chart that shows the last 30 countries ranked by their publication count. Each country is represented by a bar, and the length of the bar corresponds to the publication count.
-
a pie chart that illustrates the percentage of ERIH Plus journals that are covered in OpenCitations Meta and the percentage that are not covered. The chart includes labels for each section showing the coverage status and the corresponding percentage.
-
a pie chart that represents the distribution of the 'Open Access' categories. Each category is represented by a slice of the pie, and the size of each slice corresponds to the count or percentage of occurrences.
-
a choropleth representation of the publications by country. Each country is filled with a color based on its publication count, as specified by the 'Publication_count' column. Hovering over a country shows its name and additional information.